A qualitative study of adherence to nutritional treatment: perspectives of patients and dietitians
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 February 2014
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Patient Preference and Adherence
- Vol. 8, 147-54
Abstract
Background: Effective interaction between care providers and patients is crucial for the success of most medical treatments; in nutritional medical treatment, it is of paramount importance. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the role of the dietitian–patient relationship and the counseling approach in influencing individual patient decisions to adhere to counseling by persisting with nutritional treatment. Methods: We conducted focus groups with two types of patients, namely, those who had consulted dietitians only once and those who had attended at least three appointments. We divided these two groups into 12 focus groups. In addition, in-depth interviews were held with 17 clinical dietitians. Our qualitative research was based on the perceptions of patients and dietitians. Results: When the encounter between the dietitian and the patient followed the standard educational and informative approach, both the short-term nature of the interaction and the absence of an individualized therapeutic program discouraged patients from persisting with treatment. In contrast, the counseling and therapeutic nutritional approach promoted nutritional guidance through broader behavioral and lifestyle therapies. This approach appears more appropriate for chronically ill patients. The dietitians and some of the patients understand that the profession is changing from the informative and educational approach to a therapeutic counseling approach, but it is difficult for them to adapt to the new model. Conclusion: Most patients appear to want individualized, not standardized, treatment. In order to change patients' eating patterns, dietitians must adopt a more therapeutic approach and relate to patients’ cultural needs and desires to achieve sustainable results.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Socioeconomic status and gender affects utilization of Medical Nutrition TherapyDiabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2013
- Assessment of dietitians’ nutrition counselling self‐efficacy and its positive relationship with reported skill usageJournal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 2010
- Does low socioeconomic status affect use of nutritional services by pre‐diabetes patients?International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 2009
- The headwaters of family medicineBMJ, 2008
- Evidence‐Based Medical Nutrition Therapy for DiabetesNutrition in Clinical Practice, 2004
- Using focus groups to determine what constitutes quality of life in clients receiving medical nutrition therapy: First steps in the development of a nutrition quality-of-life survey☆☆☆★Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2003
- Relative efficacy of differential methods of dietary advice: a systematic reviewThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2003
- Cognitive-behavioral approaches in the management of obesity.2003
- The paradox of the parts and the whole in understanding and improving general practiceInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2002
- Clinical role expectations and performance of dietitians employed in British Columbia hospitals.1981