Intramedullary nailing via suprapatellar approach versus locked plating of proximal extra-articular tibial fractures: a randomized control trial
- 26 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Orthopaedics
- Vol. 45 (6) , 1599-1608
Abstract
Objective Currently, nailing through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive plating have been generally accepted in the management of displaced proximal tibial fractures. This investigation was aimed at comparing these two treatment methods in terms of their effectiveness and safety. Methods We randomized 328 patients into one of two groups: one underwent intramedullary nailing via the suprapatellar approach (IMN group), while the other underwent locking compressive plate (LCP group) placement. The primary outcome was the Iowa Knee Score at 12 months. The clinical history, amount of intra-operative blood loss, rate of fracture healing, and post-operative complications were assessed as secondary outcomes. Participants were assessed at one, two, three, six and 12 months after surgery. Results Follow-up data for a year were available for 152 and 154 patients in the IMN group and LCP group, respectively. No intergroup difference was detected with regard to the Iowa Knee Scores (91 ± 8.2 in the IMN group and 90 ± 7.3 in the LCP group, respectively (p = 0.26)), at 12 months. Duration of operation (83.5 ± 35.3 min), amount of blood loss (55 ± 43 mL), duration of fluoroscopy (53.7 ± 3.9 s), and cases with difficult reduction (n = 46) in the IMN group did not differ significantly from those in the LCP group (80.1 ± 43.6 min; 65 ± 56 mL; 48 ± 12 s; 32) (p < 0.05). The two groups had similar post-operative complications and rate of fracture union, with the pre-injury activity level being restored in most patients. Removal of the implants was performed in 31.6% and 63.0% of the cases in the IMN and LCP groups, respectively, indicating a significant intergroup difference. Conclusion Both IMN through the suprapatellar approach and minimally invasive LCP were found to yield no significant intergroup difference of clinical outcomes in the treatment of proximal, extra-articular tibial fractures. However, the requirement of implant removal was more relevant to LCP.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (11602093, 11432016)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes following combined intramedullary nail and plate fixation for complex tibia fractures: A multi-centre studyInjury, 2015
- A multicentre case series of tibia fractures treated with the Expert Tibia Nail (ETN)Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2012
- Suprapatellar versus Infra-Patellar Intramedullary Nail Insertion of the Tibia: A Cadaveric Model for Comparison of Patellofemoral Contact Pressures and ForcesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2010
- Influence of Medial Parapatellar Nail Insertion on Alignmentin Proximal Tibia Fractures—Special Consideration of the Fracture LevelJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2010
- Technical pitfall while reducing the mismatch between LCP PLT and upper end Tibia in proximal Tibia fracturesArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2009
- Intramedullary Nailing Versus Percutaneous Locked Plating of Extra-Articular Proximal Tibial Fractures: Comparison of 56 CasesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2009
- Intramedullary Nailing of Proximal Quarter Tibial FracturesJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2006
- Three-year Results of Proximal Tibia Fractures Treated with the LISSClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2006
- Knee and ankle function after displaced non-isolated fractures of the tibial shaft, a retrospective comparison between plate fixation and intramedullary nailingEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2005
- Treatment of Proximal Tibia Fractures Using the Less Invasive Stabilization SystemJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 2004