Clinical validation of the Rapid Cough Questionnaire across diverse lung diseases
Open Access
- 22 June 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Open Respiratory Research
- Vol. 13 (1) , e004163
Abstract
Background: The Rapid Cough Questionnaire (RCQ) is a simplified three-item instrument developed as a pragmatic alternative to the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). However, its performance across diverse respiratory diseases, particularly structural lung diseases, has not been sufficiently validated. This study evaluated the performance of the RCQ across major respiratory disease subgroups. Methods: A total of 300 adult patients with chronic cough were prospectively enrolled from multiple respiratory centres. Participants completed five cough-specific instruments: Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Cough Symptom Score (CSS), COugh Assessment Test (COAT), LCQ and RCQ. Construct validity was evaluated using correlation analyses across disease subgroups, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and bronchiectasis. Results: The RCQ showed strong correlations with the LCQ (r=0.93), COAT (r=−0.75), CSS (r=−0.62) and NRS (r=−0.59). These relationships remained robust among all aetiologies, with the correlation coefficients between RCQ and LCQ exceeding 0.88 in each subgroup. Bland-Altman plots and an intraclass correlation analysis indicated a high level of concordance between the RCQ and LCQ scores. The RCQ aligned closely with multidimensional symptom burden and maintained strong correlation with the LCQ even for IPF, where LCQ correlations with unidimensional tools (NRS or CSS) were attenuated. Conclusions: The RCQ demonstrated strong cross-sectional concordance with the LCQ across heterogeneous respiratory conditions. Its brevity and consistent performance support its suitability in routine clinical practice and large-scale or longitudinal research settings. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its responsiveness and longitudinal performance.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2024-00359875)
- Korean Academy of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Disease (KATRD-S-2023-1)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is cough important in acute exacerbations of COPD?Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 2018
- Treating Cough Due to Non-CF and CF Bronchiectasis With Nonpharmacological Airway ClearanceChest, 2018
- European Respiratory Society guidelines for the management of adult bronchiectasisEuropean Respiratory Journal, 2017
- Korean version of the Cough Symptom Score: clinical utility and validity for chronic coughThe Korean Journal of Internal Medicine, 2017
- Cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosisEuropean Respiratory Review, 2016
- Reliability and Validity of a Korean Version of the Leicester Cough QuestionnaireAllergy, Asthma & Immunology Research, 2015
- Cough and sputum production as risk factors for poor outcomes in patients with COPDRespiratory Medicine, 2011
- Cough and its importance in COPDInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2006
- Chronic Cough Due to BronchiectasisChest, 2006
- Development of a symptom specific health status measure for patients with chronic cough: Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ)Thorax, 2003