Evidence of Reduced β-Cell Function in Asian Indians With Mild Dysglycemia
Open Access
- 13 August 2013
- journal article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 36 (9) , 2772-2778
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine β-cell function across a spectrum of glycemia among Asian Indians, a population experiencing type 2 diabetes development at young ages despite low BMI. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: One-thousand two-hundred sixty-four individuals without known diabetes in the Diabetes Community Lifestyle Improvement Program in Chennai, India, had a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, with glucose and insulin measured at 0, 30, and 120 min. Type 2 diabetes, isolated impaired fasting glucose (iIFG), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (iIGT), combined impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance, and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) were defined by American Diabetes Association guidelines. Measures included insulin resistance and sensitivity (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance [HOMA-IR], modified Matsuda Index, 1/fasting insulin) and β-cell function (oral disposition index = [Δinsulin0–30/Δglucose0–30] × [1/fasting insulin]). RESULTS: Mean age was 44.2 years (SD, 9.3) and BMI 27.4 kg/m2 (SD, 3.8); 341 individuals had NGT, 672 had iIFG, IGT, or IFG plus IGT, and 251 had diabetes. Patterns of insulin resistance or sensitivity were similar across glycemic categories. With mild dysglycemia, the absolute differences in age- and sex-adjusted oral disposition index (NGT vs. iIFG, 38%; NGT vs. iIGT, 32%) were greater than the differences in HOMA-IR (NGT vs. iIFG, 25%; NGT vs. iIGT, 23%; each P < 0.0001). Compared with NGT and adjusted for age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, and family history, the odds of mild dysglycemia were more significant per SD of oral disposition index (iIFG: odds ratio [OR], 0.36; 95% CI, 0.23–0.55; iIGT: OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24–0.56) than per SD of HOMA-IR (iIFG: OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.23–2.33; iIGT: OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.11–2.11). CONCLUSIONS: Asian Indians with mild dysglycemia have reduced β-cell function, regardless of age, adiposity, insulin sensitivity, or family history. Strategies in diabetes prevention should minimize loss of β-cell function.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Distinct β-Cell Defects in Impaired Fasting Glucose and Impaired Glucose ToleranceDiabetes, 2012
- Reduced Time Points to Calculate the Composite IndexDiabetes Care, 2010
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2010Diabetes Care, 2010
- Effects of Exercise Training Intensity on Pancreatic β-Cell FunctionDiabetes Care, 2009
- Physical Inactivity and Obesity Underlie the Insulin Resistance of AgingDiabetes Care, 2009
- Primary Defects in β-Cell Function Further Exacerbated by Worsening of Insulin Resistance Mark the Development of Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Obese AdolescentsDiabetes Care, 2009
- Natural History of Insulin Sensitivity and Insulin Secretion in the Progression From Normal Glucose Tolerance to Impaired Fasting Glycemia and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: The Inter99 StudyDiabetes Care, 2009
- Oral Disposition Index Predicts the Development of Future Diabetes Above and Beyond Fasting and 2-h Glucose LevelsDiabetes Care, 2009
- Progressive Loss of β-Cell Function Leads to Worsening Glucose Tolerance in First-Degree Relatives of Subjects With Type 2 DiabetesDiabetes Care, 2007
- Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetesNature, 2006