Delivery System Support Prevents Endocardial Entanglement and Delamination During Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
- 1 April 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
- Vol. 19 (4) , e014355
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms behind endocardial entanglement and resultant delamination during left bundle branch area pacing, as well as potential solutions, have not been fully demonstrated in the human heart. METHODS: Active fixation of a lumenless screw-in lead into the right ventricular septum was attempted with or without delivery system support using donor human hearts rejected for transplant. Delivery sheath support was ensured through firm catheter support maintained by a fixed clip. Endocardial entanglement, endocardial delamination after unscrewing, and lead penetration were evaluated using both macroscopic and microscopic analyses. RESULTS: Each of 10 lead deployments with or without support was attempted using 4 donor human hearts. There was a higher incidence of endocardial entanglement and resultant helix-only penetration in the nonsupport group than the support group (70% versus 0%). Unscrewing after the endocardial entanglement consistently revealed extensively delaminated endocardium entwined around the helix. The median endocardial delamination area was larger in the entanglement group than in the nonentanglement group (25.0 mm 2 versus 0.9 mm 2 , P <0.001). In the regions with endocardial entanglement, histological analysis confirmed extensive endocardial delamination with minimal myocardial injury. On the other hand, localized endocardial delamination and deep intramural penetration were observed in the regions without entanglement. Screw-in procedures reattempted into the regions with extensive endocardial delamination following entanglement achieved deep penetration even without delivery system support. CONCLUSIONS: Endocardial entanglement and delamination were confirmed in donor human hearts. Adequate delivery system support, particularly its coaxiality and counterforce effect, is likely to prevent endocardial entanglement and facilitate effective penetration of a lumenless screw-in lead into the human ventricular septum.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Left bundle area pacing in hypertrophied hearts: An ex vivo ovine model to study deployment of pacing leads in thick septumHeart Rhythm, 2025
- Overcoming Lead Penetration Failure in Left Bundle Branch Area PacingJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2024
- Assessing Torque Transfer in Conduction System PacingJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2024
- Cardiac Conduction System PacingJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2023
- 2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failureHeart Rhythm, 2023
- Distance between the lead-implanted site and tricuspid valve annulus in patients with left bundle branch pacing: Effects on postoperative tricuspid regurgitation deteriorationHeart Rhythm, 2022
- Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyJACC, 2022
- Left bundle branch area pacing outcomes: the multicentre European MELOS studyEuropean Heart Journal, 2022
- Rescue left bundle branch area pacing in coronary venous lead failure or nonresponse to biventricular pacing: Results from International LBBAP Collaborative Study GroupHeart Rhythm, 2022
- Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapyHeart Rhythm, 2022