Powers of Life and Death Beyond Governmentality
Author:
- Mitchell DeanMDMitchell Dean
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cultural Values
- Vol. 6 (1-2) , 119-138
Abstract
The work of Foucault on liberal government, and that of his followers, is subject to two dangers. The first is to regard the critical character of liberalism (as governing through freedom) as providing safeguards against the despotic potentials of biopower and sovereignty. The second is to regard these heterogenous powers of life and death as somehow simply relocated or reinscribed within the field of liberal governmentality. The latter point is a major methodological error; the former closes the gap between the analytics of government and the normativity of liberalism itself. By working through these dangers, our understanding of the ethos of liberal government is transformed. That ethos today requires us to link governing through freedom to the powers of life and death, the exercise of choice to the sovereign decision, the contract to violence, economic citizenship to moral discipline and obligation, and rights and liberties to enforcement.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Liberal government and authoritarianismEconomy and Society, 2002
- Foucault Contra Foucault:Theoretical Criminology, 2001
- Review Essay : Welfare and its VicissitudesActa Sociologica, 2000
- Rationalities and refugee resettlementEconomy and Society, 1998
- Beyond histories of the presentEconomy and Society, 1998
- Workfare: A Geopolitical EtymologyEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Space, 1998
- Governmentality, criticism, politicsEconomy and Society, 1997
- Politics and governmentalityEconomy and Society, 1997
- II. The Nineteenth-Century Revolution in Government: A Reappraisal ReappraisedThe Historical Journal, 1960
- IV. The Nineteenth-Century Revolution in Government: A ReappraisalThe Historical Journal, 1958