Wild-type distributions of minimum inhibitory concentrations and epidemiological cut-off values—laboratory and clinical utility
- 20 December 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Society for Microbiology in Clinical Microbiology Reviews
- Vol. 36 (4) , e0010022
Abstract
SUMMARY: The characterization of wild-type minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and zone diameter distributions with the setting of epidemiological cut-off values (ECOFFs or ECVs) provides a reference for the otherwise relative MIC values in the international system for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Distributions of MIC values for a species and an agent follow a log-normal distribution, which in the absence of resistance mechanisms is monomodal and designated wild type (WT). The upper end of the WT distribution, the ECOFF, can be identified with statistical methods. In the presence of phenotypically detectable resistance, the distribution has at least one more mode (the non-WT), but despite this, the WT is most often identifiable using the same methods. The ECOFF provides the most sensitive measure of resistance development in a species against an agent. The WT and non-WT modes are independent of the organism´s response to treatment, but when the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) determines the clinical breakpoints, the committee avoids breakpoints that split WT distributions of target species. This is to avoid the poorer reproducibility of susceptibility categorization when breakpoints split major populations but also because the EUCAST has failed to identify different clinical outcomes for isolates with different MIC values inside the wild-type distribution. In laboratory practice, the ECOFF is used to screen for and exclude resistance and allows the comparison of resistance between systems with different breakpoints from different breakpoint organizations, breakpoints evolving over time, and different breakpoints between human and animal medicine. The EUCAST actively encourages colleagues to question MIC distributions as presented on the website ( https://www.eucast.org/mic_and_zone_distributions_and_ecoffs ) and to contribute MIC and inhibition zone diameter data.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Estimation of the wild‐type minimum inhibitory concentration value distributionStatistics in Medicine, 2013
- Pan-European resistance monitoring programmes encompassing food-borne bacteria and target pathogens of food-producing and companion animalsInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2013
- Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Azoles and Aspergillus fumigatus Based on a Novel Mathematical Approach Incorporating cyp51A Sequence AnalysisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2012
- Normalized Resistance Interpretation as a Tool for Establishing Epidemiological MIC Susceptibility BreakpointsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2010
- Wild-type MIC distributions of four fluoroquinolones active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in relation to current critical concentrations and available pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dataJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2010
- Wild-Type MIC Distribution and Epidemiological Cutoff Values for Aspergillus fumigatus and Three Triazoles as Determined by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Broth Microdilution MethodsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Breakpoints for Susceptibility Testing Should Not Divide Wild-Type Distributions of Important Target SpeciesAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2009
- Statistical characterisation of bacterial wild-type MIC value distributions and the determination of epidemiological cut-off valuesClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2006
- The effect of interlaboratory variability on antimicrobial susceptibility determinationDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2005
- European harmonization of MIC breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteriaJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2003