Clinicopathological features of tumor mutation burden, Epstein-Barr virus infection, microsatellite instability and PD-L1 status in Chinese patients with gastric cancer
Open Access
- 1 May 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Diagnostic Pathology
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) is the 4th most common type of cancer worldwide. Different GC subtypes have unique molecular features that may have different therapeutic methods. The aim of the present study was to investigate Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, the expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and gene mutations in GC patients. Methods: The data of 2504 GC patients, who underwent curative gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy at Peking University Cancer Hospital between 2013 and 2018, were reviewed. We analyzed the clinicopathological factors associated with the immunohistochemistry (IHC) profiles of these patients, and genetic alterations were analyzed using next generation sequencing (NGS). Results: Mismatch repair-deficient (d-MMR) GC patients were found to have a higher probability of expressing PD-L1 (p = 0.000, PD-L1 cutoff value = 1%). In addition, 4 and 6.9% of the 2504 gastric cancer patients were EBV-positive and d-MMR, respectively. The number of MLH1/PMS2-negative cases was 126 (6%), and the number of MSH2/MSH6-negative cases was 14 (0.9%). d-MMR status was associated with a intestinal group (p = 0.012), but not with tumor differentiation. Furthermore, MSI and d-MMR GC status (detected by NGS and IHC, respectively) were consistently high, and the rate of MSI was higher in patients with d-MMR GC. A number of genes associated with DNA damage repair were detected in GC patients with MSI, including POLE, ETV6, BRCA and RNF43. In patients with a high tumor mutation burden, the most significantly mutated genes were LRP1B (79.07%), ARID1A (74.42%), RNF43 (69.77%), ZFHX3 (65.12%), TP53 (58.14%), GANS (51.16%), BRCA2 (51.16%), PIK3CA (51.16%), NOTCH1 (51.16%), SMARCA4 (48.84%), ATR (46.51%), POLE (41.86%) and ATM (39.53%). Conclusions: Using IHC and NGS, MSI status, protein expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and genetic alterations were identified in patients with GC, which provides a theoretical basis for the future clinical treatment of GC.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Targeted Therapies for Targeted Populations: Anti-EGFR Treatment for EGFR-Amplified Gastroesophageal AdenocarcinomaCancer Discovery, 2018
- Methods and significance of the combined detection of HER2 gene amplification and chemosensitivity in gastric cancerCancer Biomarkers, 2018
- Mismatch repair deficiency predicts response of solid tumors to PD-1 blockadeScience, 2017
- Lauren classification and individualized chemotherapy in gastric cancerOncology Letters, 2016
- Update on Epstein-Barr virus and gastric cancer (Review)International Journal of Oncology, 2015
- Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinomaNature, 2014
- Comprehensive genome- and transcriptome-wide analyses of mutations associated with microsatellite instability in Korean gastric cancersGenome Research, 2013
- BRCA1 and BRCA2: 1994 and beyondNature Reviews Cancer, 2004
- The Putative Tumor Suppressor LRP1B, a Novel Member of the Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Receptor Family, Exhibits Both Overlapping and Distinct Properties with the LDL Receptor-related ProteinJournal of Biological Chemistry, 2001
- THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO‐CALLED INTESTINAL‐TYPE CARCINOMAActa Pathologica Microbiologica Scandinavica, 1965