Temporary Investment Tax Incentives: Theory with Evidence from Bonus Depreciation
Authors:
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 98 (3) , 737-768
Abstract
The intertemporal elasticity of investment for long-lived capital goods is nearly infinite. Consequently, investment prices should fully reflect temporary tax subsidies, regardless of the investment supply elasticity. Since prices move one-for-one with the subsidy, elasticities can be inferred from quantities alone. This paper uses a recent tax policy—bonus depreciation—to estimate the investment supply elasticity. Investment in qualified capital increased sharply. The estimated elasticity is high—between 6 and 14. There is no evidence that market prices reacted to the subsidy, suggesting that adjustment costs are internal, or that measurement error masks the price changes. (JEL G31, H32)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Factor Adjustment CostsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Investment, Overhang, and Tax PolicyBrookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2004
- Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment andqJournal of Political Economy, 2000
- How responsive is business capital formation to its user cost?Journal of Public Economics, 1999
- Investment Tax Incentives, Prices, and the Supply of Capital GoodsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1998
- Tax policy and business fixed investment in the United StatesJournal of Public Economics, 1992
- Recent U.S. investment behavior and the tax reform act of 1986: A disaggregate viewCarnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 1991
- Inflation, Tax Rules and Investment: Some Econometric EvidenceEconometrica, 1982
- Dynamic effects of permanent and temporary tax policies in a q model of investmentJournal of Monetary Economics, 1982
- Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical InterpretationEconometrica, 1982