Uptake and experience of professional interpreting services in primary care in a South Asian population: a national cross-sectional study
Authors:
Open Access
- 27 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Primary Care
- Vol. 25 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Interpreting services bridge language barriers that may prevent patients and clinicians from understanding each other, impacting quality of care and health outcomes. Despite this, there is limited up-to-date evidence regarding the barriers to and facilitators of uptake in primary care. The aim of this study was to ascertain current national uptake and experience of interpreting services in primary care (general practice) by South Asian communities in England. We conducted a national cross-sectional survey in 2023 with people with limited or no English language proficiency (n = 609). Multilingual researchers interviewed people from Bangladeshi (n = 213), Indian (n = 200), and Pakistani (n = 196) backgrounds from four regions in England (Greater London, Midlands, Yorkshire and the Humber, North West). Sixty-three percent of participants reported using professional interpreting services in primary care. The most common modality was face-to-face interpreting (55%), followed by telephone (17%) and video (8%). Multivariable analysis identified several correlates of lower uptake: participants from Indian backgrounds, those living in the Midlands, and those whose family member/friend interpreted for them within the past year were less likely to have used a professional interpreter provided by their general/family practice. Participants who had visited primary care within the last 12 months, had requested an interpreter but were told they could not have one, were informed about professional interpreting services, and were given choice in their language support were more likely to have used a professional interpreter. Our approach provides novel data on professional interpreting service use and evidence about the factors that may play a role in patient uptake and experience.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR134866, NIHR134866, NIHR134866, NIHR134866, NIHR134866, NIHR134866, NIHR134866, NIHR134866, NIHR134866)
- NIHR Applied Research Collaborations West Midlands
- NIHR CL PSRC
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interpreting at the End of Life: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Interpreters on the Delivery of Palliative Care Services to Cancer Patients With Limited English ProficiencyJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2016
- Events per variable (EPV) and the relative performance of different strategies for estimating the out-of-sample validity of logistic regression modelsStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2014
- Problems and consequences in the use of professional interpreters: qualitative analysis of incidents from primary healthcareNursing Inquiry, 2011
- Impact of Patient Language Proficiency and Interpreter Service Use on the Quality of Psychiatric Care: A Systematic ReviewPsychiatric Services, 2010
- Comparing In-Person, Video, and Telephonic Medical InterpretationJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- Interpreted consultations as ‘business as usual’? An analysis of organisational routines in general practicesSociology of Health & Illness, 2007
- Do Professional Interpreters Improve Clinical Care for Patients with Limited English Proficiency? A Systematic Review of the LiteratureHealth Services Research, 2006
- The Impact of Medical Interpreter Services on the Quality of Health Care: A Systematic ReviewMedical Care Research and Review, 2005
- Remote interpretation in medical encounters: a systematic reviewJournal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 2005
- Fluency in the consulting room.2003