Soil water availability modulates the response of grapevine leaf gas exchange and PSII traits to a simulated heat wave
Open Access
- 10 February 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Plant and Soil
- Vol. 501 (1-2) , 537-554
Abstract
Background and aims: A better understanding of plant carbon assimilation, water status and photosystem performance responses to combined heat and drought stress would help to optimize grapevine management under such limiting conditions. Methods: Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured in potted grapevines, cv Sauvignon Blanc, before, during and after simulated six-day heat (Tmax = 40 °C) wave using heated well-watered (HW), heated drought-stressed (HD), non-heated well-watered (CW) and non-heated dry (CD) vines. Results: Photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in HW vines increased during the morning and dropped in the afternoon with respect to CW vines. Daily plant transpiration in HW almost doubled that of CW vines. When grapevines were already exposed to drought, the effects of the heat wave were negligible, with HD plants showing similar leaf photosynthesis and transpiration to their CD counterparts. Heat, but not drought stress, decreased the maximum (Fv/Fm) and effective photochemical quantum yield of PSII (φPSII), and also affected the use of absorbed energy. HW plants dissipated more radiative energy as heat, a protective mechanism of the photosystem, while HD vines increased the energy dissipated by non-regulated non-photochemical pathways, which might lead to photoinhibition damages. The different behavior could be due to the enhanced transpiration rate and consequent decrease in leaf temperature in HW as compared to HD vines. After the heat wave, only HW vines recovered the afternoon values of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and φPSII to similar levels as those in CW vines. Conclusion: Drought had a more significant effect than heat stress on photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration. The combined heat and drought stress, however, increased the proportion of energy lost by the leaves through harmful non-regulated dissipative pathways. With adequate soil water availability, grapevines withstood the heat wave period through an increase in leaf transpiration, which decreased leaf temperature and protected the PSII from heat damage.Keywords
Funding Information
- Provincia autonoma di Bolzano - Alto Adige (CLEVAS project)
- Libera Università di Bolzano
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Water and carbon fluxes in an apple orchard during heat wavesEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2022
- Towards a sustainable viticulture: The combination of deficit irrigation strategies and agroecological practices in Mediterranean vineyards. A review and updateAgricultural Water Management, 2022
- Water limitation mitigates high-temperature stress injuries in grapevine cultivars through changes in photosystem II efficiency and antioxidant enzyme pathwaysActa Physiologiae Plantarum, 2019
- Dynamics of regulated YNPQ and non-regulated YNO energy dissipation in sunflower leaves exposed to sinusoidal lightsPhotosynthesis Research, 2019
- Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequelPhotosynthesis Research, 2016
- Principles of Agronomy for Sustainable Agriculture2016
- Photosynthesis, photoinhibition, and antioxidant system in tomato leaves stressed by low night temperature and their subsequent recoveryPlant Science, 2012
- Steady-State and Maximum Chlorophyll Fluorescence Responses to Water Stress in Grapevine LeavesRemote Sensing of Environment, 2000
- Wine, weather and climateWeather, 1999
- The Spectral Determination of Chlorophylls a and b, as well as Total Carotenoids, Using Various Solvents with Spectrophotometers of Different ResolutionJournal of Plant Physiology, 1994