Outcome of Transperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy (TPLU) for proximal ureteral stone > 15 mm: Our experience with 60 cases
Authors:
- Ali EslahiAEAli Eslahi
- Faisal AhmedFAFaisal Ahmed
- Mohammad RahimiMRMohammad Rahimi
- Seyed Hamed JafariSJSeyed Hamed Jafari
- Seyyed Hossein HosseiniSHSeyyed Hossein Hosseini
- Saleh Al-WageehSASaleh Al-Wageeh
- Pegah Mohammad Zadeh ShiraziPSPegah Mohammad Zadeh Shirazi
- Khalil Al-NaggarKAKhalil Al-Naggar
- Ebrahim Al-ShamiEAEbrahim Al-Shami
- Mohammad Hossein TaghrirMohammad Hossein Taghrir
Open Access
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by PAGEPress Publications in Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia
- Vol. 93 (3) , 330-335
Abstract
Purpose: We aim to review our experience of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (TPLU) for proximal ureteric stone more than 15 mm. Patients and methods: Between June 2017 to December 2020, sixty patients with a history of unsuccessful Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and/or failed ureteroscopy for impacted ureteral calculi more than 15 mm who accepted TPLU were enrolled in our study. The patients' demographic information and post-treatment results were gathered and analyzed, retrospectively. Results: The patients' mean age was 46.25 ± 12.56 years. The mean size of the stone was 20.11 ± 4.76 mm. 37 (61.7%) patients had severe hydronephrosis (HDN) and 46 (76.7%) stones were radio-opaque. Almost all of the patients underwent TPLU by a single urologist. The mean operation time was 72.86 ± 6.07 minutes without intraoperative complication (only 3 stones had upward migration to the pyelocaliceal system). The main operative blood loss was 88.86 ml. The average length of stay in the hospital was 45.8 ± 8.11 hours. The stone free rate (SFR) at discharge was 57 (95%). The overall complication rate was 27 (45%). Regarding early complications, fever was found in 8 (13.3%) patients, and 3 patients (5%) had paralytic ileus. The rate of urine leak was 8.3%, and 8 (13.3%) patients required blood transfusions. In multivariate analysis, the multiple stones, bigger stone in size, incomplete SFR, longer duration of hospital admission, and severe HDN were associated with a high early complication rate (p = 0.05, 0.04, < 001, 0.03, and 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: TPLU is a harmless option for managing proximal ureteric stone as a primary procedure or salvage procedure with good outcomes and acceptable complication rates.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Transperitoneal Ureterolithotomy: A Single-Center ExperienceJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2013
- Transperitoneal Versus Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparison StudyJournal of Urology, 2013
- Laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy for large ureteric stonesUrology Annals, 2012
- Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy – A single centre 10 year experienceInternational Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Experiences in Laparoscopic Removal of Upper Ureteral Stones: Multicenter Analysis of Cases, Based on the TurkUroLap GroupJournal of Endourology, 2010
- Semirigid Ureteroscopy for Ureteral Stones: A Multivariate Analysis of Unfavorable ResultsJournal of Urology, 2009
- Impact of Hydronephrosis on Treatment Outcome of Solitary Proximal Ureteral Stone After Extracorporeal Shock Wave LithotripsyThe Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 2008
- Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: Our experience with 74 casesInternational Journal of Urology, 2008
- L’approche lomboscopique dans le traitement des calculs urétéraux lombairesProgrès en Urologie, 2008
- Laparoscopic Transperitoneal UreterolithotomyJournal of Endourology, 2007