A thermochemical model of Eurasian Permo-Triassic mantle plumes as a basis for prediction and exploration for Cu-Ni-PGE and rare-metal ore deposits
Authors:
- N.L. DobretsovNDN.L. Dobretsov
- A.S. BorisenkoABA.S. Borisenko
- A.E. IzokhAIA.E. Izokh
- S.M. ZhmodikSZS.M. Zhmodik
- 1 September 2010
- journal article
- Published by GeoScienceWorld in Russian Geology and Geophysics
- Vol. 51 (9) , 903-924
Abstract
Four stages of the thermochemical plume—lithosphere interaction generating a broad mushroom-like head of plume and especially fourth regressive cooling phase have the important role for metallogeny. The analysis of a thermochemical plume model together with recent geological and geochronological data on magmatic ore systems in the Siberian, Tarim, Emeishan, Central European, and some other large igneous provinces (LIPs) enabled the following characteristics of the metallogeny in large igneous provinces to be revealed: (1) the specific combination of mineralization types, which include magmatic Cu-Ni-Pt and Fe-Pt; hydrothermal Ni-Co-As (±Ag, U, Au), Au-As, Ag-Sb, Au-Hg, Sb-Hg and stratiform Cu (copper-bearing sandstones and shales enriched in Co, Ni, Ag, Pt);(2) the areal or spot-like pattern of the location of mineralization types (opposed to the linear-belt localization in subduction and rift settings);(3) the zoned distribution of mineralization types relative to LIPs’ centers, with Cu-Ni-Pt, Fe-Pt and stratiform Cu mineralization localized in a LIP center, and hydrothermal mineralization bound to a LIP periphery;(4) the essential contemporaneity of the formation of each mineralization type in LIPs, and the existence of coeval but spatially separated Cu-Ni-Pt, Ni-Co-As and Au-As deposits;(5) the close linkage between different mineralization types and particular pulses of mafic, alkaline mafic, and felsic magmatism;(6) the unified succession of ore-forming events;(7) the close relationship between the extent of mineralization and LIP igneous volumes, which in turn depend on the plume heat power. The major characteristics of localization of different mineralization types within LIPs, the timing and genetic relationships between mineralization and types of magmatism, as well as specific geological controls on ore formation provide a basis for establishing new geological, magmatic, litological, and geochemical criteria crucial for predicting and targeting new mineralization within LIPs.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Permian Layered Intrusive Complex in the Western Tarim Block, Northwestern China: Product of a Ca. 275‐Ma Mantle Plume?The Journal of Geology, 2008
- Modelling of thermochemical plumes and implications for the origin of the Siberian trapsLithos, 2008
- Permian peralkaline, peraluminous and metaluminous A-type granites in the Panxi district, SW China: Their relationship to the Emeishan mantle plumeChemical Geology, 2007
- Baimazhai, Yunnan Province, China: A Hydrothermally Modified Magmatic Nickel-Copper-PGE Sulfide DepositInternational Geology Review, 2006
- Permo-Carboniferous magmatism and rifting in Europe: introductionGeological Society, London, Special Publications, 2004
- Permo-Carboniferous magmatism of the Northeast German BasinTectonophysics, 1996
- Numerical investigations of the mantle plume initiation model for flood basalt eventsJournal of Geophysical Research, 1994
- Large igneous provinces: Crustal structure, dimensions, and external consequencesReviews of Geophysics, 1994
- Diachronous and independent histories of plutonism and mineralization in the Cornubian Batholith, southwest EnglandJournal of the Geological Society, 1993
- Continental drift and a theory of convectionTerra Nova, 1990