Prevalence of serum antibodies against six Leptospira serovars in healthy dogs
Authors:
- Jennifer E. StokesJSJennifer E. Stokes
- John B. KaneeneJKJohn B. Kaneene
- William D. SchallWSWilliam D. Schall
- John M. KrugerJKJohn M. Kruger
- RoseAnn MillerRMRoseAnn Miller
- Lana KaiserLKLana Kaiser
- Carole A. BolinCBCarole A. Bolin
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
- Vol. 230 (11) , 1657-1664
Abstract
Objective—To determine the prevalence of antibodies against 6 Leptospira serovars and determine risk factors associated with positive Leptospira titers in healthy client-owned dogs in Michigan. Design—Cross-sectional study. Animals—1,241 healthy dogs at least 4 months of age. Procedures—Dogs were examined by veterinarians at private practices. Vaccinated and unvaccinated dogs were enrolled in the study, which occurred prior to the availability of a 4-serovar (Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Pomona) Leptospira vaccine. Sera were tested by use of the microscopic agglutination test to determine antibody titers against Leptospira serovars Bratislava, Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Hardjo, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Pomona. A questionnaire was used to collect demographic information about each dog to identify risk factors associated with seropositive status. Results—309 of 1,241 (24.9%) dogs had antibody titers against at least 1 of the 6 Leptospira serovars, which suggested exposure to Leptospira spp. Prevalence of antibodies was highest to serovar Grippotyphosa, followed by Bratislava, Canicola, Icterohaemorrhagiae, and Pomona. Age, travel outside Michigan, exercise outside fenced yards, and exposure to livestock and wildlife were significant risk factors for positive titers. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance—Among healthy dogs from the lower peninsula of Michigan, > 20% have antibodies against leptospiral serovars historically considered uncommon but more recently incriminated as causing clinical canine leptospirosis. Wildlife and livestock may be of increasing importance as reservoirs for canine leptospirosis as urbanization continues to occur. Expanded vaccination strategies may partially mitigate these trends.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serologic responses of dogs given a commercial vaccine against Leptospira interrogans serovar pomona and Leptospira kirschneri serovar grippotyphosaAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research, 2005
- Comparison of the efficacy of three commercial bacterins in preventing canine leptospirosisVeterinary Record, 2003
- Duration of immunity in dogs vaccinated against leptospirosis with a bivalent inactivated vaccineVeterinary Microbiology, 2003
- Treatment and outcome of dogs with leptospirosis: 36 cases (1990–1998)Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 2000
- Further determination of DNA relatedness between serogroups and serovars in the family Leptospiraceae with a proposal for Leptospira alexanderi sp. nov. and four new Leptospira genomospeciesInternational Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 1999
- Naturally acquired leptospirosis in 36 dogs: serological and clinicopathological featuresJournal of Small Animal Practice, 1998
- Canine leptospirosis in New Jersey and Michigan: 17 cases (1990-1995)Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association, 1996
- Diagnosis of leptospirosis: A reemerging disease of companion animalsSeminars in Veterinary Medicine and Surgery: Small Animal, 1996
- Canine Leptospirosis: A Retrospective Study of 17 CasesJournal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, 1992
- The Change in the Epidemiology and Clinical Manifestations of Canine Leptospirosis in Vienna since 1956Journal of Small Animal Practice, 1964