Child Feces Disposal Practices in Rural Orissa: A Cross Sectional Study
Open Access
- 20 February 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 9 (2) , e89551
Abstract
An estimated 2.5 billion people worldwide lack access to improved sanitation facilities. While large-scale programs in some countries have increased latrine coverage, they sometimes fail to ensure optimal latrine use, including the safe disposal of child feces, a significant source of exposure to fecal pathogens. We undertook a cross-sectional study to explore fecal disposal practices among children in rural Orissa, India in villages where the Government of India's Total Sanitation Campaign had been implemented at least three years prior to the study. We conducted surveys with heads of 136 households with 145 children under 5 years of age in 20 villages. We describe defecation and feces disposal practices and explore associations between safe disposal and risk factors. Respondents reported that children commonly defecated on the ground, either inside the household (57.5%) for pre-ambulatory children or around the compound (55.2%) for ambulatory children. Twenty percent of pre-ambulatory children used potties and nappies; the same percentage of ambulatory children defecated in a latrine. While 78.6% of study children came from 106 households with a latrine, less than a quarter (22.8%) reported using them for disposal of child feces. Most child feces were deposited with other household waste, both for pre-ambulatory (67.5%) and ambulatory (58.1%) children. After restricting the analysis to households owning a latrine, the use of a nappy or potty was associated with safe disposal of feces (OR 6.72, 95%CI 1.02–44.38) though due to small sample size the regression could not adjust for confounders. In the area surveyed, the Total Sanitation Campaign has not led to high levels of safe disposal of child feces. Further research is needed to identify the actual scope of this potential gap in programming, the health risk presented and interventions to minimize any adverse effect.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on Latrine Coverage and Use: A Cross-Sectional Study in Orissa Three Years following Programme ImplementationPLOS ONE, 2013
- The effect of improved rural sanitation on diarrhoea and helminth infection: design of a cluster-randomized trial in Orissa, IndiaEmerging Themes in Epidemiology, 2012
- Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000The Lancet, 2012
- Diarrhea incidence in low- and middle-income countries in 1990 and 2010: a systematic reviewBMC Public Health, 2012
- Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventionsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010
- Optimization of household survey sampling without sample framesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- DiarrheaThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 1998
- Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards analysis I. Background, goals, and general strategyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Importance of events per independent variable in proportional hazards regression analysis II. Accuracy and precision of regression estimatesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1995
- Potties, pits and pipes: Explaining hygiene behaviour in Burkina FasoSocial Science & Medicine, 1995