Characterizing Parental Use of a HIPAA-Compliant Large Language Model Chatbot in Rare Pediatric Diseases: Insights from Think-Aloud Sessions
- 28 May 2026
- journal article
- brief scientific-communication
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Applied Clinical Informatics
- Vol. 17 (03) , 459-465
Abstract
Parents of children with rare and serious illnesses often have unmet information needs. Large language models (LLMs) can help parents seek medical information. However, few studies have observed parents' use of LLMs or how they would use it in conjunction with their patient portal. We provided parents of children with cancer or vascular anomalies (VAs) access to a secure Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)-compliant chatbot. We characterized how parents used the tool while accessing their child's patient portal and evaluated the chatbot responses. Parents participated in think-aloud sessions (n = 48). Parents accessed a HIPAA-compliant GPT 4 Endpoint and entered queries about their child's illness. We examined query length and chatbot response length, accuracy, and readability. We also conducted content analysis on parent queries. We analyzed 451 queries and 451 responses. Parents' queries ranged from 1 to 104 words. They entered primarily short well-formed questions or phrases/statements. Some entered single words or incomplete phrases. Content was related to diagnosis/etiology, treatment, symptoms/side effects, laboratory values, imaging results, clinician notes/documentation, and supportive resources, with some differences between VA and cancer contexts. Chatbot responses ranged from 9 to 883 words The mean accuracy rating was 4.9 ± 0.5 and the mean Flesch Reading Ease score was 28.4 ± 15.0 (college-graduate level). Parents' queries varied in length, complexity, and content, with some differences indicating unique information needs by disease context. Chatbot responses were accurate yet written at a reading level potentially challenging for some users. Future studies should consider these patterns and characteristics when designing health-related chatbot-based tools.Keywords
Funding Information
- Pedal the Cause at Siteman Cancer Center and Siteman Kids at St. Louis Children's Hospital (FDN-2024-1354)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trust, Transparency, and Acceptability of Artificial Intelligence‐Powered Communication Tools in Cancer: Focus Groups With Parents, Adolescents, and Young AdultsPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2025
- Patient Portal Use Among Patients With Vascular Anomalies and Their CaregiversPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2025
- Validating a novel measure for assessing patient openness and concerns about using artificial intelligence in healthcareLearning Health Systems, 2024
- The utility of ChatGPT in generating patient-facing and clinical responses for melanomaJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2023
- Implementation Fidelity of Chatbot Screening for Social Needs: Acceptability, Feasibility, AppropriatenessApplied Clinical Informatics, 2023
- Communication with parents and young adult patients affected by complex vascular malformationsPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2022
- Online patient portal use by caregivers in pediatric oncology: Are we widening sociodemographic disparities?Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 2021
- Palliative Care as a Standard of Care in Pediatric OncologyPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2015
- The think aloud method: a guide to user interface designInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2004
- A new readability yardstick.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1948