In-hospital mortality among patients injured in motor vehicle crashes in a Saudi Arabian hospital relative to large U.S. trauma centers
Open Access
- 27 August 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Injury Epidemiology
- Vol. 1 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
Traffic-related fatalities are a leading cause of premature death worldwide. According to the 2012 report the Global Burden of Disease 2010, traffic injuries ranked 8th as a cause of death in 2010, compared to 10th in 1990. Saudi Arabia is estimated to have an overall traffic fatality rate more than double that of the U.S., but it is unknown whether mortality differences also exist for injured patients seeking medical care. We aim to compare in-hospital mortality between Saudi Arabia and the United States, adjusting for severity and demographic variables. The analysis included 485,611 patients from the U.S. National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) and 5,290 patients from a trauma registry at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. For comparability, we restricted our sample to NTDB data from level-I public trauma centers (≥400 beds) in the U.S. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of setting (KAMC vs. NTDB) on in-hospital mortality after adjusting for age, sex, Triage-Revised Scale (T-RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), mechanism of injury, hypotension, surgery and head injuries. Interactions between setting and ISS, and predictors were also evaluated. Injured patients in the Saudi registry were more likely to be males, and younger than those from the NTDB. Patients at the Saudi hospital were at higher risk of in-hospital death than their U.S. counterparts. In the highest severity group (ISSs, 25–75), the odds ratio of in-hospital death in KAMC versus NTDB was 5.0 (95% CI 4.3-5.8). There were no differences in mortality between KAMC and NTDB among patients from lower ISS groups (ISSs, 1–8, 9–15, and 16–24). Patients who are severely injured following traffic crash injuries in Saudi Arabia are significantly more likely to die in the hospital than comparable patients admitted to large U.S. trauma centers. Further research is needed to identify reasons for this disparity and strategies for improving the care of patients severely injured in traffic crashes in Saudi Arabia.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting early death in patients with traumatic bleeding: development and validation of prognostic modelBMJ, 2012
- Socioeconomic impact on device-associated infections in pediatric intensive care units of 16 limited-resource countriesPediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2012
- Influence of the National Trauma Data Bank on the Study of Trauma Outcomes: Is It Time to Set Research Best Practices to Further Enhance Its Impact?Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2012
- Association Between Helicopter vs Ground Emergency Medical Services and Survival for Adults With Major TraumaJAMA, 2012
- The development of simple survival prediction models for blunt trauma victims treated at Asian emergency centersScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Pre-hospital trauma care: A comparison of two healthcare systemsIndian Journal of Critical Care Medicine, 2012
- Comparing regression-adjusted mortality to standardized mortality ratios for trauma center profilingJournal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock, 2012
- Trauma research in low- and middle-income countries is urgently needed to strengthen the chain of survivalScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2011
- More Operations, More Deaths? Relationship Between Operative Intervention Rates and Risk-Adjusted Mortality at Trauma CentersJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2010
- Comparison of Mortality Due to Severe Multiple Trauma in Two Comprehensive Models of Emergency Care: Atlantic Pyrenees (France) and Navarra (Spain)The Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009