Exploratory study of personal health information management using health literacy model
Authors:
- 15 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Vol. 70 (1) , 104-122
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to empirically test whether individuals’ internal factors (prior knowledge, resources, and capability) and environmental factors (stimuli, limitation) have any influence on the development of personal health information management (PHIM) literacy skills and which constructs are statistically associated with general health-related outcomes.Design/methodology/approach: Survey responses were collected from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (mTurk), a crowdsourcing internet service, in December 2013. A total of 578 responses were analyzed using partial-least squares structural equation modeling technique.Findings: The model as a whole exhibited 62.8 percent of variance in health-related outcomes. The findings suggest that prior knowledge has a direct effect on health literacy (HL) skills (H3:β=0.212,pβ=0.475,pβ=0.526,p<0.001) through the mediator of stimuli and the knowledge variable.Research limitations/implications: One possible limitation of this study is that the study may include a highly technology literate group, as survey respondents were recruited from the online service mTurk.Practical implications: The study poses implications for further research and practice. This research was an exploratory work for further model development so future studies should investigate deeper into real personal health record (PHR) user groups (e.g. patients and caregivers). For example, studies by White and Horvitz (2009a, b) conducted real-time user studies that the authors could apply to the authors’ future PHR studies. Since the findings cannot be generalizable to these specific groups, similar research may be conducted. Using caregiver groups of PHR users in comparison to patient groups could determine the similarities and differences of their PHIM activities and related outcomes for optimal design of self-care management.Social implications: Further, it is suggested to conduct large scale, real-time-based studies using a PHR transaction log analysis to achieve conclusiveness and generalizability. Additionally, future studies should address not only diverse real-time user groups, but also various PHR data sources and their presentation issues.Originality/value: This study model offers an important perspective on PHIM and its causal pathway for use not only by patient educators and healthcare providers but also information providers, personal health record (PHR) system developers, and PHR users.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- If We Offer it, Will They Accept? Factors Affecting Patient Use Intentions of Personal Health Records and Secure MessagingJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- The Health Literacy Skills FrameworkJournal of Health Communication, 2012
- Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and modelsBMC Public Health, 2012
- “Teach to Goal”: Theory and Design Principles of an Intervention to Improve Heart Failure Self-Management Skills of Patients with Low Health LiteracyJournal of Health Communication, 2011
- The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor marketExperimental Economics, 2011
- Results of the Medications At Transitions and Clinical Handoffs (MATCH) Study: An Analysis of Medication Reconciliation Errors and Risk Factors at Hospital AdmissionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2010
- The meaning and the measure of health literacyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Literacy and health outcomesJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2004
- The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income parents: a comparison of print, video, and computer-based presentationsPatient Education and Counseling, 2004
- Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement ErrorJournal of Marketing Research, 1981