The Effectiveness of the Third Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine: When Should It Be Performed?
Authors:
- Giacomo BiganzoliGBGiacomo Biganzoli
- Marco MendolaMMMarco Mendola
- Pier Mario PerronePPPier Mario Perrone
- Laura Maria AntonangeliLaura Maria Antonangeli
- Anna Beatrice Elena LongoALAnna Beatrice Elena Longo
- Paolo CarrerPCPaolo Carrer
- Claudio ColosioClaudio Colosio
- Dario ConsonniDario Consonni
- Giuseppe MaranoGMGiuseppe Marano
- Patrizia BoracchiPBPatrizia Boracchi
- Elia BiganzoliEBElia Biganzoli
- Silvana CastaldiSCSilvana Castaldi
Open Access
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 vaccination is the most significant step toward the long-term mitigation of SARS-CoV-2-related complication, avoiding disease and death and decreasing virus spread. This study aimed to evaluate, in a real-world setting, booster dose effectiveness to reduce COVID-19 risk considering the amount of time after the end of the two-dose vaccination cycle. A sub-analysis was conducted to adjust the booster dose effect for occupational and demographic factors. Methods: About 16,000 COVID-19-vaccinated HCWs of three University Hospital Networks in Milan (HN1/HN2/HN3) were included in the study. Data were collected by Occupational Health Physicians of the HNs within specific computerized databases. Results: In univariable analysis, booster dose administration displayed a slightly higher risk of infection with respect to not receiving it, OR = 1.18, with 95% confidence interval (C.I) [0.99, 1.41]. When the model was adjusted with the modulating effect of time from the completion of the vaccination cycle on booster dose administration, the latter resulted in strong protective effect against infection, OR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.26, 0.74]. However, considering the modifying influence of time from the vaccination cycle’s completion, the administration of booster doses appeared to have a protective effect against infection. In HN1, students and resident physicians displayed lower odds of infection with respect to physicians. Lastly, a non-linear effect of age was reported. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the correct timing in vaccine scheduling and administration is critical to vaccine effectiveness. These findings, applicable to all vaccinations, should help in setting up more effective vaccination strategies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Fondazione Romeo ed Enrica Invernizzi
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- A practical treatment for COVID‐19 and the next pandemicPharmacology Research & Perspectives, 2022
- COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Healthcare Personnel Who Generally Accept VaccinesJournal of Community Health, 2022
- Omicron and Delta variant of SARS‐CoV‐2: A comparative computational study of spike proteinJournal of Medical Virology, 2021
- Covid‐19 vaccines and variants of concern: A reviewReviews in Medical Virology, 2021
- Preparing for the next pandemic: It is more than just about numbersClinical Imaging, 2021
- Preparing for the Next PandemicAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2021
- Association between previous infection with SARS CoV-2 and the risk of self-reported symptoms after mRNA BNT162b2 vaccination: Data from 3,078 health care workerseClinicalMedicine, 2021
- The Nature and Extent of COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy in Healthcare WorkersJournal of Community Health, 2021
- Planning for a COVID-19 Vaccination ProgramJAMA, 2020
- Infection-acquired versus vaccine-acquired immunity in an SIRWS modelInfectious Disease Modelling, 2018