Optimization of PSA Screening Policies
- 20 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 32 (2) , 337-349
Abstract
Objective. To estimate the benefit of PSA-based screening for prostate cancer from the patient and societal perspectives. Method. A partially observable Markov decision process model was used to optimize PSA screening decisions. Age-specific prostate cancer incidence rates and the mortality rates from prostate cancer and competing causes were considered. The model trades off the potential benefit of early detection with the cost of screening and loss of patient quality of life due to screening and treatment. PSA testing and biopsy decisions are made based on the patient’s probability of having prostate cancer. Probabilities are inferred based on the patient’s complete PSA history using Bayesian updating. Data Sources. The results of all PSA tests and biopsies done in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1993 to 2005 (11,872 men and 50,589 PSA test results). Outcome Measures. Patients’ perspective: to maximize expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); societal perspective: to maximize the expected monetary value based on societal willingness to pay for QALYs and the cost of PSA testing, prostate biopsies, and treatment. Results. From the patient perspective, the optimal policy recommends stopping PSA testing and biopsy at age 76. From the societal perspective, the stopping age is 71. The expected incremental benefit of optimal screening over the traditional guideline of annual PSA screening with threshold 4.0 ng/mL for biopsy is estimated to be 0.165 QALYs per person from the patient perspective and 0.161 QALYs per person from the societal perspective. PSA screening based on traditional guidelines is found to be worse than no screening at all. Conclusions. PSA testing done with traditional guidelines underperforms and therefore underestimates the potential benefit of screening. Optimal screening guidelines differ significantly depending on the perspective of the decision maker.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Optimal Breast Biopsy Decision-Making Based on Mammographic Features and Demographic FactorsOperations Research, 2010
- Assessing contamination and compliance in the prostate component of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening TrialClinical Trials, 2010
- Markov Decision Processes: A Tool for Sequential Decision Making under UncertaintyMedical Decision Making, 2009
- Mortality Results from a Randomized Prostate-Cancer Screening TrialNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Screening and Prostate-Cancer Mortality in a Randomized European StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Lead Time and Overdiagnosis in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening: Importance of Methods and ContextJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2009
- Optimal Management of High-Risk T1G3 Bladder Cancer: A Decision AnalysisPLOS Medicine, 2007
- The $64,000 question—What is a quality-adjusted life-year worth?Clinical Therapeutics, 2006
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: The Roles of Science, Policy, and Opinion in Determining What is Best for PatientsAnnual Review of Medicine, 1999
- A survey of algorithmic methods for partially observed Markov decision processesAnnals of Operations Research, 1991