Which Vegetation Index? Benchmarking Multispectral Metrics to Hyperspectral Mixture Models in Diverse Cropland
Open Access
- 10 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Remote Sensing
- Vol. 15 (4) , 971
Abstract
The monitoring of agronomic parameters like biomass, water stress, and plant health can benefit from synergistic use of all available remotely sensed information. Multispectral imagery has been used for this purpose for decades, largely with vegetation indices (VIs). Many multispectral VIs exist, typically relying on a single feature—the spectral red edge—for information. Where hyperspectral imagery is available, spectral mixture models can use the full VSWIR spectrum to yield further insight, simultaneously estimating area fractions of multiple materials within mixed pixels. Here we investigate the relationships between VIs and mixture models by comparing hyperspectral endmember fractions to six common multispectral VIs in California’s diverse crops and soils. In so doing, we isolate spectral effects from sensor- and acquisition-specific variability associated with atmosphere, illumination, and view geometry. Specifically, we compare: (1) fractional area of photosynthetic vegetation (Fv) from 64,000,000 3–5 m resolution AVIRIS-ng reflectance spectra; and (2) six popular VIs (NDVI, NIRv, EVI, EVI2, SR, DVI) computed from simulated Planet SuperDove reflectance spectra derived from the AVIRIS-ng spectra. Hyperspectral Fv and multispectral VIs are compared using both parametric (Pearson correlation, ρ) and nonparametric (Mutual Information, MI) metrics. Four VIs (NIRv, DVI, EVI, EVI2) showed strong linear relationships with Fv (ρ > 0.94; MI > 1.2). NIRv and DVI showed strong interrelation (ρ > 0.99, MI > 2.4), but deviated from a 1:1 correspondence with Fv. EVI and EVI2 were strongly interrelated (ρ > 0.99, MI > 2.3) and more closely approximated a 1:1 relationship with Fv. In contrast, NDVI and SR showed a weaker, nonlinear, heteroskedastic relation to Fv (ρ < 0.84, MI = 0.69). NDVI exhibited both especially severe sensitivity to unvegetated background (–0.05 < NDVI < +0.6) and saturation (0.2 < Fv < 0.8 for NDVI = 0.7). The self-consistent atmospheric correction, radiometry, and sun-sensor geometry allows this simulation approach to be further applied to indices, sensors, and landscapes worldwide.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2022-67019-36397, NNH21ZDA001N-LCLUC, 80NSSC22K0907, 2226649)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2022-67019-36397, NNH21ZDA001N-LCLUC, 80NSSC22K0907, 2226649)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (2022-67019-36397, NNH21ZDA001N-LCLUC, 80NSSC22K0907, 2226649)
- National Science Foundation (2022-67019-36397, NNH21ZDA001N-LCLUC, 80NSSC22K0907, 2226649)
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development of a two-band enhanced vegetation index without a blue bandRemote Sensing of Environment, 2008
- The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing spaceRemote Sensing of Environment, 2004
- Estimating mutual informationPhysical Review E, 2004
- Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index for Remote Quantification of Biophysical Characteristics of VegetationJournal of Plant Physiology, 2004
- Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indicesRemote Sensing of Environment, 2002
- Estimation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysisInternational Journal of Remote Sensing, 2001
- Quantifying Vegetation Change in Semiarid EnvironmentsRemote Sensing of Environment, 2000
- Green vegetation, nonphotosynthetic vegetation, and soils in AVIRIS dataRemote Sensing of Environment, 1993
- A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI)Remote Sensing of Environment, 1988
- Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetationRemote Sensing of Environment, 1979