Give me back my empties or else! A preliminary analysis of customer compliance in reverse logistics practices (UK)
Author:
- 1 September 2006
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Management Research News
- Vol. 29 (9) , 532-551
Abstract
Purpose – This research aims to conduct an exploratory analysis into current industrial reverse logistics practice in business-to-business (B2B) and business-to-customer relationships (B2C), and determine the financial and operational impact of customer non-compliance in returning distribution equipment back to their source. Design/methodology/approach – The analysis was conducted over multiple industry sectors using qualitative research techniques. The research sample included seven industry sectors, providing a response rate of 72 per cent (53 sources approached). The focus was on both B2B and B2C relationships to determine similarities and differences in financial and operational repercussions. Findings – The research findings indicate that the efficacy of the reverse logistics system can be undermined by lack of customer compliance, with losses of up to £140 million (B2B). Research limitations/implications – In both B2B and B2C relationships, there is evidence of suppliers suffering financial loss due to customer non-compliance. Due to the small scale of the analysis and the breadth of the industry sectors investigated, these results are not generalisable, but do indicate that this is an area, which could undermine supply chain effectiveness. Practical implications – Non-compliance of this nature carries a direct and highly applicable cost for manufacturers and distributors in the practitioner arena. Suppliers within industry need to acknowledge this issue and manage their reverse logistics more effectively. Originality/value – This paper adopts an innovative focus on an understated feature of the reverse logistics cycle, i.e. the recycling of distribution equipment used to transport outbound and returned products. The paper identifies a range of options, which practitioners can use as guidance when managing the returns system.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Examining buyer‐supplier relationships within a service sector contextSupply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2005
- Reverse logistics: superior performance through focused resource commitments to information technologyTransportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2005
- Business relationship alignment: on the commensurability of value capture and mutuality in buyer and supplier exchangeSupply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2004
- Reactions to unethical consumer behavior across six countriesJournal of Consumer Marketing, 2004
- How to choose an effective third party logistics providerManagement Research News, 2003
- Modelling product returns in inventory control—exploring the validity of general assumptionsInternational Journal of Production Economics, 2003
- Return handling: an exploratory study with nine retailer warehousesInternational Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2002
- Return policies and the optimal level of “hassle”Journal of Economics and Business, 1998
- Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A reviewEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1997
- How to Avoid Being Bullied by Unreasonable CustomersManaging Service Quality: An International Journal, 1994