C-reactive protein and leukocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children
Authors:
- José Ignacio Martín-ParraJMJosé Ignacio Martín-Parra
- Isabel SecoISIsabel Seco
- Luis García-CastrilloLGLuis García-Castrillo
- Angel NaranjoANAngel Naranjo
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Vol. 42 (10) , 1325-1329
Abstract
14) years operated on under a clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis, confirmed by pathologic examination of the removed appendix, was then correlated with C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and a combination of both C-reactive protein and leukocyte count, with a logistic regression model. C-reactive protein serum measurements were performed by an immunoturbidimetric test. The patients were divided into two groups according to the pathologic features of the removed appendix: Group A (n=104), patients with acute appendicitis, and Group B (n=20), patients without acute appendicitis. To assess the accuracy of C-reactive protein, leukocyte counts, and a combination of both parameters, receiver operating characteristic curves were used. The areas under the curve were compared using the maximum likelihood estimation method. RESULTS: There were 95 cases (76.6 percent) of nonperforated appendicitis, 9 cases (7.3 percent) of perforated appendicitis and 20 cases (16.1 percent) of normal appendix. Mean C-reactive protein in Group A was 4.3 (standard deviation, 6.6) and in Group B was 1.2 (standard deviation, 1.7; P =0.03). The C-reactive protein and leukocyte count values were correlated with the pathologic diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Mean C-reactive protein values increase as the pathologic inflammation type progresses (P =0.007). The C-reactive protein receiver operating characteristic curve shows that the C-reactive protein value with highest accuracy was 1.7 mg/dl. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates calculated in the 1.7 cutoff were 58, 80, and 83.8 percent, respectively. A comparison of the respective receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrates that C-reactive protein, leukocyte count, and the combination of both tests all have a good diagnostic value but without any significant difference (P =0.2). CONCLUSIONS: In children, 1) serum C-reactive protein is increased in acute appendicitis; 2) such increase is related to the severity of the appendiceal inflammation; and 3) although serum C-reactive protein has an adequate diagnostic accuracy, neither individually nor in combination with the leukocyte count is it significantly better than the leukocyte count alone. Presented in part at the Congress of the Collegium Internationale Chirurgiae Digestivae, Madrid, Spain, September 16 to 19, 1998. © The ASCRS 1999...Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Computed Tomography of the Appendix on Treatment of Patients and Use of Hospital ResourcesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1998
- HAVE THE EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS CHANGED WITH NEW TECHNOLOGY?Surgical Clinics of North America, 1997
- C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1996
- Accuracy of serum c-reactive protein measurements in diagnosis of acute appendicitis compared with surgeon's clinical impressionDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1995
- The Diagnostic Value of Repetitive Preoperative Analyses of C-Reactive Protein and Total Leucocyte Count in Patients with Suspected Acute AppendicitisScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 1994
- Review of the pathologic diagnoses of 2,216 appendectomy specimensThe American Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Role of sequential leucocyte counts and C-reactive protein measurements in acute appendicitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1992
- Laboratory aid in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1989
- Aids in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1989
- The value of the leucocyte count in the diagnosis of acute appendicitisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1976