Implications of the Nature of “Expertise” for Teaching and Faculty Development
- 1 June 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Michigan Library in To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development
- Vol. 17 (1) , 123-138
Abstract
Over the last two decades cognitive theorists have learned that the development of expertise goes beyond the accumulation of knowledge and skills: expertise includes the development of pattern recognition and learned procedures that enable practitioners to deal with problems effortlessly or intuitively. Even more recently, theorists are distinguishing experts from experienced non-experts by how they use the bonus time and energy gained from solving problems intuitively. Experts invest it in tackling problems that increase their expertise rather than reduce problems to previously learned routines. Some implications of these different views of expertise for teaching and faculty development are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- From TeachingtoLearning —A New Paradigm For Undergraduate EducationChange: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 1995
- Reflecting Critically On Our Efforts To Improve Teaching and LearningTo Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 1995
- What clinical teachers in medicine need to knowAcademic Medicine, 1994
- How attending physicians make instructional decisions when conducting teaching roundsAcademic Medicine, 1992
- Three stages of teacher competence: A developmental perspectiveNew Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 1989
- Knowledge and Teaching:Foundations of the New ReformHarvard Educational Review, 1987
- The Quest for Excellence in University TeachingThe Journal of Higher Education, 1987
- Structuring and Adjusting Content for Students: A Study of Live and Simulated Tutoring of AdditionAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1987
- Metaphors Underlying the Improvement of Teaching and LearningBritish Journal of Educational Technology, 1986