Public support for and concerns regarding pediatric dose optimization for seizures in emergency medical services: An exception from informed consent (EFIC) trial
- 7 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 31 (7) , 656-666
Abstract
Background: Federal regulations allow exception from informed consent (EFIC) to study emergent conditions when obtaining prospective consent is not feasible. Little is known about public views on including children in EFIC studies. The Pediatric Dose Optimization for Seizures in EMS (PediDOSE) trial implements age‐based, standardized midazolam dosing for pediatric seizures. The primary objective of this study was to determine public support for and concerns about the PediDOSE EFIC trial. The secondary objective was to assess how support for PediDOSE varied by demographics.Methods: We conducted a mixed‐methods study in 20 U.S. communities. Participants reviewed information about PediDOSE before completing an online survey. Descriptive data were generated. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis identified factors associated with support for PediDOSE. Reviewers identified themes from free‐text response data regarding participant concerns.Results: Of 2450 respondents, 79% were parents/guardians, and 20% had a child with previous seizures. A total of 96% of respondents supported PediDOSE being conducted, and 70% approved of children being enrolled without prior consent. Non‐Hispanic Black respondents were less likely than non‐Hispanic White respondents to support PediDOSE with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 0.57 (95% CI 0.42–0.75). Health care providers were more likely to support PediDOSE, with strongest support among prehospital emergency medicine clinicians (aOR 5.82, 95% CI 3.19–10.62). Age, gender, parental status, and level of education were not associated with support of PediDOSE. Common concerns about PediDOSE included adverse effects, legal and ethical concerns about enrolling without consent, and potential racial bias.Conclusions: In communities where this study will occur, most respondents supported PediDOSE being conducted with EFIC and most approved of children being enrolled without prior consent. Support was lowest among non‐Hispanic Black respondents and highest among health care providers. Further research is needed to determine optimal ways to address the concerns of specific racial and ethnic groups when conducting EFIC trials.Keywords
Funding Information
- Maternal and Child Health Bureau (U03MC00001, U03MC00007, U03MC22684, U03MC28844, U03MC33154, U03MC33155, U03MC33156, UJ5MC30824)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U01NS114042)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Updated Guidance on the Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in Medical and Science JournalsJAMA, 2021
- Public Approval of Exception From Informed Consent in Emergency Clinical TrialsJAMA Network Open, 2019
- The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partnersJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2019
- Learning From Experience: A Systematic Review of Community Consultation Acceptance DataAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2015
- A Brief Educational Intervention May Increase Public Acceptance of Emergency Research Without ConsentThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- The Random Dialing Survey as a Tool for Community Consultation for Research Involving the Emergency Medicine Exception From Informed ConsentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Challenges in Enrollment of Minority, Pediatric, and Geriatric Patients in Emergency and Acute Care Clinical ResearchAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2008
- How Do Institutional Review Boards Apply the Federal Risk and Benefit Standards for Pediatric Research?JAMA, 2004
- Informed consent in emergency research. Consensus statement from the Coalition Conference of Acute Resuscitation and Critical Care Researchers1995