Proposal of a stochastic model to determine the bibliometric variables influencing the quality of a journal: application to the field of Dentistry
- 9 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientometrics
- Vol. 115 (2) , 1087-1095
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Secretaría de Estado de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion (MTM2017-88708-P)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact Factor DistortionsScience, 2013
- Skewed citation distributions and bias factors: Solutions to two core problems with the journal impact factorJournal of Informetrics, 2012
- Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papersScientometrics, 2012
- How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor: Normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010
- Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2010
- A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact MeasuresPLOS ONE, 2009
- The Misused Impact FactorScience, 2008
- Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factorJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008
- Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factorThe FASEB Journal, 2008
- The Validity of Comparative ExperimentsJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1948