Educational Implications of Choosing “Practice” to Describe Science in the Next Generation Science Standards
- 25 September 2015
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Science Education
- Vol. 99 (6) , 1041-1048
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Authority and accountability in light of disciplinary practices in scienceInternational Journal of Educational Research, 2014
- Classroom communities' adaptations of the practice of scientific argumentationScience Education, 2010
- Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical DiscourseScience, 2010
- Identifying and resolving uncertainty as a mediated action in science: A comparative analysis of the cultural tools used by scientists and elementary science students at workScience Education, 2009
- Making sense of argumentation and explanationScience Education, 2008
- Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learningScience Education, 2008
- Chapter 1: Redefining Disciplinary Learning in Classroom ContextsReview of Research in Education, 2006
- Children's Understanding of Scientific Inquiry: Their Conceptualization of Uncertainty in Investigations of Their Own DesignCognition and Instruction, 2004
- Guiding Principles for Fostering Productive Disciplinary Engagement: Explaining an Emergent Argument in a Community of Learners ClassroomCognition and Instruction, 2002
- Reconsidering the 'nature of science' as a curriculum componentJournal of Curriculum Studies, 2000