Indirect land use emissions in the life cycle of biofuels: regulations vs science
- 17 April 2009
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
- Vol. 3 (3) , 318-328
Abstract
Recent legislative mandates have been enacted at state and federal levels with the purpose of reducing life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from transportation fuels. This legislation encourages the substitution of fossil fuels with ‘low‐carbon’ fuels. The burden is put on regulatory agencies to determine the GHG‐intensity of various fuels, and those agencies naturally look to science for guidance. Even though much progress has been made in determining the direct life cycle emissions from the production of biofuels, the science underpinning the estimation of potentially signifi cant emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC) is in its infancy. As legislation requires inclusion of ILUC emissions in the biofuel life cycle, regulators are in a quandary over accurate implementation. In this article, we review these circumstances and offer some suggestions for how to proceed with the science of indirect effects and regulation in the face of uncertain science. Besides investigating indirect deforestation and grassland conversion alone, a more comprehensive assessment of the total GHG emissions implications of substituting biofuels for petroleum needs to be completed before indirect effects can be accurately determined. This review fi nds that indirect emissions from livestock and military security are particularly important, and deserve further research. © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, LtdKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improvements in Life Cycle Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Corn‐EthanolJournal of Industrial Ecology, 2009
- Climate change and health costs of air emissions from biofuels and gasolineProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- Will EU biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets?European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2008
- Interactions among Amazon land use, forests and climate: prospects for a near-term forest tipping pointPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2008
- Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrassProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- The emergence of land change science for global environmental change and sustainabilityProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- The Ripple Effect: Biofuels, Food Security, and the EnvironmentEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 2007
- Cropland expansion changes deforestation dynamics in the southern Brazilian AmazonProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND THE ENVIRONMENTAnnual Review of Environment and Resources, 2004
- Reduced methane emissions from large‐scale changes in water management of China's rice paddies during 1980–2000Geophysical Research Letters, 2002