Coronary Rotational Atherectomy Elective Versus Bailout in Patients With Severely Calcified Lesions and Chronic Renal Failure (CRATER) Trial
- 2 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 106 (3) , 1702-1712
Abstract
Background: Plaque modification is crucial for successful stent expansion in calcified coronary lesions. Although rotational atherectomy (RA) improves initial procedural success compared to balloon predilatation, data comparing elective versus bailout RA, particularly in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, are scarce. Aims: To perform a cost analysis of elective RA (E‐RA) versus bailout RA (B‐RA) to treat severely calcified lesions in patients with CKD, comparing procedural material cost and total healthcare cost. Methods: This prospective, multicentre, randomized study compared the costs, safety, and efficacy of E‐RA versus B‐RA in severely calcified lesions in CKD patients. Participants were randomized 1:1. The primary endpoint was total healthcare cost at 30 days; secondary endpoints included procedural success, stent expansion, and in‐hospital complications. Results: One hundred and twenty‐four patients were enrolled (62 per group). The mean age was 77.3 ± 8.3 years; 69.4% were male. There were no baseline clinical differences between both treatment arms. Procedural success was similar (B‐RA: 95.2% vs. E‐RA: 93.6%; p = 0.69), but crossover was higher in B‐RA (20.9% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.014). Procedural complications were more frequent in the elective group (6.5% vs. 22.5%; p = 0.04). The B‐RA group tended to higher balloon cost (2100.3 vs. 1485.1€; p = 0.06), while E‐RA had higher burr costs (374.2 vs. 1408.8€; p < 0.01) and tended toward higher stent costs (2396.7 vs. 2836.1€; p = 0.06). Overall, procedural material costs were higher in E‐RA (6676.9 vs. 7683.3€; p = 0.02), but total healthcare costs were not significantly different (12569.1 vs. 14879.1€; p = 0.09). Conclusions: Total healthcare costs were comparable between B‐RA and E‐RA. A substantial number of patients with CKD and severe CAC required crossover from B‐RA, highlighting the potential benefit of E‐RA. Besides, the high number of complications underscores the need for expert operators.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rotational Atherectomy, Lithotripsy, or Laser for Calcified Coronary StenosisJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2025
- Coronary intravascular lithotripsy and rotational atherectomy for severely calcified stenosis: Results from the ROTA.shock trialCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2023
- 10-Year All-Cause Mortality Following Percutaneous or Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Heavy CalcificationJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2022
- Rotational atherectomy: In hospital results of a real life experience for the treatment of complex calcified coronary lesionsArchives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements, 2022
- Combined use of rotational and excimer lASER coronary atherectomy (RASER) during complex coronary angioplasty—An analysis of cases (2006–2016) from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society databaseCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2020
- Early chronic kidney disease–mineral bone disorder stimulates vascular calcificationKidney International, 2014
- High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Before Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Implantation in Complex Calcified Coronary LesionsJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2013
- Relationship of Estimated GFR and Coronary Artery Calcification in the CRIC (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) StudyAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2011
- Incidence and progression of coronary calcification in chronic kidney disease: the Multi-Ethnic Study of AtherosclerosisKidney International, 2009
- Comparison of costs of new atherectomy devices and balloon angioplasty for coronary artery diseaseThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1994