Cemented or Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Intracapsular Hip Fracture
Authors:
- Miguel A. FernandezMFMiguel A. Fernandez
- Juul AchtenJAJuul Achten
- Nicholas ParsonsNPNicholas Parsons
- Xavier L. GriffinXavier L. Griffin
- May-Ee PngMPMay-Ee Png
- Jenny GouldJGJenny Gould
- Alwin McGibbonAMAlwin McGibbon
- Matthew L. CostaMCMatthew L. Costa
Top Cited Papers
- 10 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 386 (6) , 521-530
Abstract
Controversy exists over the use of bone cement in hip fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty. Only limited data on quality of life after cemented as compared with modern uncemented hemiarthroplasties are available. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial comparing cemented with uncemented hemiarthroplasty in patients 60 years of age or older with an intracapsular hip fracture. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life measured with the use of utility scores on the EuroQol Group 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire at 4 months after randomization (range of scores, −0.594 to 1, with higher scores indicating better quality of life; range for minimal clinically important difference, 0.050 to 0.075). A total of 610 patients were assigned to undergo cemented hemiarthroplasty and 615 to undergo modern uncemented hemiarthroplasty; follow-up data were available for 71.6% of the patients at 4 months. The mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.371 in patients assigned to the cemented group and 0.315 in those assigned to the uncemented group (adjusted difference, 0.055; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.009 to 0.101; P=0.02). The between-group difference at 1 month was similar to that at 4 months, but the difference at 12 months was smaller than that at 4 months. Mortality at 12 months was 23.9% in the cemented group and 27.8% in the uncemented group (odds ratio for death, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.05). Periprosthetic fractures occurred in 0.5% and 2.1% of the patients in the respective groups (odds ratio [uncemented vs. cemented], 4.37; 95% CI, 1.19 to 24.00). The incidences of other complications were similar in the two groups. Among patients 60 years of age or older with an intracapsular hip fracture, cemented hemiarthroplasty resulted in a modestly but significantly better quality of life and a lower risk of periprosthetic fracture than uncemented hemiarthroplasty. (Funded by the National Institute for Health Research; WHiTE 5 ISRCTN number, ISRCTN18393176.)Keywords
Funding Information
- NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
- National Institute for Health Research (PB-PG-0215-36043, PB-PG-1216-20021)
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome assessment after hip fractureBone & Joint Research, 2014
- Bias towards dementia: Are hip fracture trials excluding too many patients? A systematic reviewInjury, 2012
- Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value SetsValue in Health, 2012
- Hemiarthroplasty of the Hip with and without Cement: A Randomized Clinical TrialJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2012
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)Quality of Life Research, 2011
- Catalogue of EQ-5D Scores for the United KingdomMedical Decision Making, 2011
- Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck FracturesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- Bone cement implantation syndromeBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2009
- An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fractureOsteoporosis International, 2004
- Hip fractures in the elderly: A world-wide projectionOsteoporosis International, 1992