Comparison of electronic and visual identification systems in pigs
Authors:
- Katharina D.C StärkKSKatharina D.C Stärk
- Roger S MorrisRMRoger S Morris
- Dirk U PfeifferDPDirk U Pfeiffer
- 1 February 1998
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Livestock Production Science
- Vol. 53 (2) , 143-152
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Economic evaluation of national identification and recording systems for pigs in BelgiumPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 1997
- Simulation studies on the epidemiological impact of national identification and recording systems on the control of classical swine fever in BelgiumPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 1996
- Implant recovery and tissue reaction in growing pigs following implantation of packaging materials for injectable electronic identification and monitoring devicesPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 1996
- Electronic identification with injectable transponders in pig production: Results of a field trail on commercial farms and slaughterhouses concerning injectability and retrievabilityVeterinary Quarterly, 1995
- Effects of injecting electronic transponders into the auricle of pigs1995
- Electronic animal identification for controlling feed delivery and detecting estrus in gilts and sows in outside pens2Journal of Animal Science, 1994
- Subcutaneous tissue reaction to polyethylene terephtalate‐covered electronic identification transponders in pigsVeterinary Quarterly, 1992
- Positioning of identification transponders in the auricle of pigs1992
- The benefits of animal identification for food safety.Journal of Animal Science, 1989
- Electronic animal identification and temperature monitoring1974