Nomogram-Based Approach for Predicting Complication Risks following Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction
- 24 December 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Vol. 156 (1) , 19-27
Abstract
Background: Despite the recent steep rise in the use of prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction, concerns remain regarding the potential risk of complications, resulting in the selective application of the technique; however, the selection process was empirically based on the operator’s decision. Using patient- and operation-related factors, this study aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting postoperative complications following prepectoral DTI reconstruction. Methods: Between August of 2019 and March of 2023, immediate prepectoral DTI was performed for all patients deemed suitable for 1-stage implant-based reconstruction. A retrospective analysis of the complications was conducted for this cohort. The cohort was randomly divided into the training and the validation data sets. A nomogram was developed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression and Firth bias-reduced logistic regression. Results: The authors analyzed 433 breasts (362 patients). Complications developed in 131 patients (33.5%), including early complications within 90 days postoperatively (26.1%), infection (1.8%), wound revision (9.7%), and reconstructive failure (3.5%). Increased age and body mass index, therapeutic mastectomy, reduction pattern mastectomy, implant size, and projection, and radiotherapy history were associated with early complications. For infection and reconstructive failure, increased age and body mass index, heavier mastectomy specimen weight, implant projection, and previous and adjuvant radiotherapy showed association. The internal validation of each model demonstrated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 68.9%, 68.0%, 84.9%, and 79.0% for early complications, delayed wound healing, infection, and reconstructive failure, respectively. Conclusion: A nomogram-based approach for predicting complications in prepectoral DTI reconstruction may enhance clinical decision-making, leading to optimized outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- A comparison of clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix with and without radiation sterilization process in immediate prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstructionJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2023
- Improving Decision-making in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Reconstruction After Nipple Sparing Mastectomy: The Key Role of Flap Thickness RatioClinical Breast Cancer, 2022
- Age and Breast ReconstructionAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2022
- Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2022
- Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix: Evaluation of complications and safetyThe Breast, 2021
- Decreased postoperative pain and opioid use following prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective cohort studyJournal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, 2021
- Dual-Plane Retro-pectoral Versus Pre-pectoral DTI Breast Reconstruction: An Italian Multicenter ExperienceAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2020
- Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: A systematic review and meta analysisEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2019
- Risk Factors for Complications in Immediate Expander–Implant Breast Reconstruction for Non-obese Patients: Impact of Breast Size on ComplicationsAesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2015
- Risk Analysis of Early Implant Loss after Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Review of 14,585 PatientsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2013