Evaluation of cervical peri-implant optical density in longitudinal control of immediate implants in the anterior maxilla region
Authors:
- Renan Lucio Berbel da SilvaRSRenan Lucio Berbel da Silva
- Eduardo Felippe Duailibi NetoENEduardo Felippe Duailibi Neto
- Franscisco Fernando TodescanFTFranscisco Fernando Todescan
- Glaucio Morente RuizGRGlaucio Morente Ruiz
- Claudio Mendes PannutiCPClaudio Mendes Pannuti
- Israel ChilvarquerICIsrael Chilvarquer
- 1 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
- Vol. 49 (6) , 20190396
Abstract
Objective: This research aimed to longitudinally evaluate the optical density of peri-implant alveolar bone. The data acquired from study participants previously treated with 37 osseointegrated implants were analyzed utilizing the radiographic subtraction technique.Methods and materials: The radiographic follow-ups were performed five times: at the implantation of the prostheses and after 15, 90, 180 and 360 days. Intraoral radiographs were obtained by the paralleling technique using individualized Hanshin-type positioners to guarantee the standardization of the images. The obtained digital images were aligned and equalized before they were submitted to the radiographic subtraction procedure.Results: A significant difference was found between the distal region of Group I (patients treated with osseointegrated implants who required extraction of the dental element) and the 360 day follow-up and the distal region of Group II (patients with healed alveolar sockets) in all follow-up analyses (p < 0.05). We did not observe a significant difference between the groups analyzed and other follow-ups concerning the subcrestal and middle third regions for both the mesial and distal variables (p > 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference in the distal sites [χ2 = 5,745,, p = 0.03], showing a significant association between time and the presence of bone resorption. This association was not shown on the mesial surface (p = 0.16).Conclusion: We concluded that there was no statistically significant difference between groups I and II. Using this technique, we were able to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the changes in the proximal sites on the digital radiographic images for the analyzed data. Digital subtraction technology to measure peri-implant bone density is an accurate and reproducible technique for quantifying peri-implant bone reactions to different therapeutic modalities.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Etiologic Factors in Peri-Implantitis: Literature Review and Case ReportJournal of Oral Implantology, 2012
- A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and conventional periapical radiography at detecting peri‐implant bone defectsClinical Oral Implants Research, 2012
- Digital subtraction radiography evaluation of longitudinal bone density changes around immediate loading implants: a pilot studyDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2012
- A radiographic assessment of progressive loading on bone around single osseointegrated implants in the posterior maxillaClinical Oral Implants Research, 2004
- A Comparison of Endosseous Dental Implant SurfacesJournal of Periodontology, 1999
- Validation of Quantitative Digital Subtraction Radiography Using the Electronically Guided Alignment Device/Impression TechniqueJournal of Periodontology, 1996
- Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implantsThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1989
- A digital subtraction technique for dental radiographyOral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 1983
- A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jawInternational Journal of Oral Surgery, 1981
- The Influence of Structured Noise on the Detection of Radiologic AbnormalitiesInvestigative Radiology, 1974