Protein structure alignment significance is often exaggerated
Preprint
Abstract
Machine learning has generated millions of high-quality predicted protein structures, creating a need for computationally efficient structure search algorithms and robust estimates of statistical significance at this scale. We show that unrelated proteins have a universal tendency towards convergent evolution of secondary and tertiary motifs, causing an excess of high-scoring false positive alignments. We investigate popular structure search and alignment algorithms, finding that previous methods routinely overestimate significance by up to six orders of magnitude. To address these issues, and to accommodate recent innovations in search algorithm design, we describe a novel method for estimating statistical significance. We show that its E -values are accurate, scale successfully with database size, and are robust against the (generally unknown) diversity of folds in the database. We implement our approach in an online structure search service based on Reseek at https://reseek.online .Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fast and accurate protein structure search with FoldseekNature Biotechnology, 2023
- Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFoldNature, 2021
- Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2001
- CATH – a hierarchic classification of protein domain structuresStructure, 1997
- SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures.Journal of Molecular Biology, 1995
- Protein Structure Comparison by Alignment of Distance MatricesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1993
- Statistics of local complexity in amino acid sequences and sequence databasesComputers & Chemistry, 1993
- Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1992
- Methods for assessing the statistical significance of molecular sequence features by using general scoring schemes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1990
- Identification of common molecular subsequencesJournal of Molecular Biology, 1981