Implications of a metal‐bearing chemical boundary layer in D″ for mantle dynamics
Authors:
- 1 November 1996
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Geophysical Research Letters
- Vol. 23 (22) , 3091-3094
Abstract
At lower mantle conditions, the thermal conductivity of non‐metallic crystals is an order of magnitude lower than that of dense metallic minerals such as FeO, FeSi and Fe, which may be present in a chemical boundary layer at the base of the mantle. Because the core‐mantle boundary is nearly isothermal, variations in the thickness of a metal‐bearing layer induce lateral temperature variations of several hundred kelvin, which in turn affect the pattern of mantle convection. Upwellings should occur where the layer is thickest; the resulting stability of the metal + silicate layer with respect to the flow may also stabilize the pattern of mantle convection, and reduce its time‐dependence.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seismic detection of a thin laterally varying boundary layer at the base of the mantle beneath the central‐PacificGeophysical Research Letters, 1996
- C On the Velocity and Magnetic Fields At the Top of the CoreGeophysical Journal International, 1996
- Effect of depth-dependent viscosity on the planform of mantle convectionNature, 1996
- On the effect of continents on mantle convectionJournal of Geophysical Research, 1995
- Superplumes or supercontinents?Geology, 1994
- Melting of the FeFeO and the FeFeS systems at high pressure: Constraints on core temperaturesEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 1992
- A simple dynamo caused by conductivity variationsGeophysical & Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 1992
- Thermal core– mantle interactionsNature, 1987
- Interaction of mantle dregs with convection: Lateral heterogeneity at the core‐mantle boundaryGeophysical Research Letters, 1986
- Interpretation of the D″ zone at the base of the mantle: Dependence on assumed values of thermal conductivityGeophysical Research Letters, 1986