On the use of the likelihood ratio for forensic evaluation: Response to Fenton et al.

This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:

• When ‘neutral’ evidence still has probative value (with implications from the Barry George Case)
  Science & Justice, 2014
• Standards for the formulation of evaluative forensic science expert opinion
  Science & Justice, 2009
• Towards understanding the effect of uncertainty in the number of contributors to DNA stains
  Forensic Science International: Genetics, 2007
• An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence
  Science & Justice, 2006
• Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough?
  Forensic Science International, 2005
• The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements
  Science & Justice, 2000
• More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions
  Science & Justice, 2000
• A Bayesian approach to interpreting footwear marks in forensic casework
  Science & Justice, 1998
• A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework
  Science & Justice, 1998
• Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene
  Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 1993