Comparison Between Civilian Burns and Combat Burns From Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom
Authors:
- 1 June 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 243 (6) , 786-795
Abstract
To assess outcome differences between locally burned civilians and military personnel burned in a distant combat zone treated in the same facility. The United States Army Institute of Surgical Research (USAISR) Burn Center serves as a referral center for civilians and is the sole center for significant burns in military personnel. We made the hypothesis that outcomes for military personnel burned in the current conflict in Iraq and Afghanistan would be poorer because of delays to definitive treatment, other associated injury, and distance of evacuation. We reviewed the civilian and military records of patients treated at the USAISR from the outset of hostilities in Iraq in April 2003 to May 2005. Demographics, injury data, mortality, and clinical outcomes were compared. We cared for 751 patients during this time period, 273 of whom were military (36%). Military injuries occurred in a younger population (41 ± 19 vs. 26 ± 7 years for civilian and military respectively, P < 0.0001) with a longer time from injury to burn center arrival (1 ± 5 days vs. 6 ± 5, P < 0.0001), a higher Injury Severity Score (ISS 5 ± 8 vs. 9 ± 11, P < 0.0001), and a higher incidence of inhalation injury (8% vs. 13%, P = 0.024). Total burn size did not differ. Mortality was 7.1% in the civilian and 3.8% in the military group (P = 0.076). When civilians outside the age range of the military cohort were excluded, civilian mortality was 5.0%, which did not differ from the military group (P = 0.57). Total body surface area (TBSA) burned, age ≥40 years, presence of inhalation injury, and ventilator days were found to be important predictors of mortality by stepwise regression, and were used in a final predictive model with the area under receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.97 for both populations considered together. No significant effect of either group was identified during development. Mortality does not differ between civilians evacuated locally and military personnel injured in distant austere environments treated at the same center.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blast InjuriesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Effects of Early Excision and Aggressive Enteral Feeding on Hypermetabolism, Catabolism, and Sepsis after Severe Burn2003
- Occlusion of Hepatic Blood Inflow for Complex Central Liver Resections in Cirrhotic PatientsArchives of Surgery, 2002
- Mortality Determinants in Massive Pediatric BurnsAnnals of Surgery, 1997
- Recent Outcomes in the Treatment of Burn Injury in the United States: A Report From the American Burn Association Patient RegistryJournal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 1995
- EFFECT OF INHALATION INJURY, BURN SIZE, AND AGE ON MORTALITY1994
- Air Evacuation of Thermally Injured Patients1980
- HEMODYNAMIC CHANGES IN THE EARLY POSTBURN PATIENT THE INFLUENCE OF FLUID ADMINISTRATION AND OF A VASODILATOR (HYDRALAZINE)1971
- TREATMENT OF 1,963 BURNED PATIENTS AT 106TH GENERAL HOSPITAL YOKOHAMA, JAPAN1970
- Safe, Expeditious Transport of the Seriously Burned PatientArchives of Surgery, 1968