Critical care capacity in Canada: results of a national cross-sectional study
Authors:
- Robert A FowlerRFRobert A Fowler
- Philip AbdelmalikPAPhilip Abdelmalik
- Gordon WoodGWGordon Wood
- Denise FosterDFDenise Foster
- Noel GibneyNGNoel Gibney
- Natalie BandraukNBNatalie Bandrauk
- Alexis F TurgeonATAlexis F Turgeon
- François LamontagneFLFrançois Lamontagne
- Anand KumarAKAnand Kumar
- Ryan ZarychanskiRZRyan Zarychanski
- Sean M BagshawSBSean M Bagshaw
Open Access
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 19 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
Introduction: Intensive Care Units (ICUs) provide life-supporting treatment; however, resources are limited, so demand may exceed supply in the event of pandemics, environmental disasters, or in the context of an aging population. We hypothesized that comprehensive national data on ICU resources would permit a better understanding of regional differences in system capacity. Methods: After the 2009–2010 Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group surveyed all acute care hospitals in Canada to assess ICU capacity. Using a structured survey tool administered to physicians, respiratory therapists and nurses, we determined the number of ICU beds, ventilators, and the ability to provide specialized support for respiratory failure. Results: We identified 286 hospitals with 3170 ICU beds and 4982 mechanical ventilators for critically ill patients. Twenty-two hospitals had an ICU that routinely cared for children; 15 had dedicated pediatric ICUs. Per 100,000 population, there was substantial variability in provincial capacity, with a mean of 0.9 hospitals with ICUs (provincial range 0.4-2.8), 10 ICU beds capable of providing mechanical ventilation (provincial range 6–19), and 15 invasive mechanical ventilators (provincial range 10–24). There was only moderate correlation between ventilation capacity and population size (coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.771). Conclusion: ICU resources vary widely across Canadian provinces, and during times of increased demand, may result in geographic differences in the ability to care for critically ill patients. These results highlight the need to evolve inter-jurisdictional resource sharing during periods of substantial increase in demand, and provide background data for the development of appropriate critical care capacity benchmarks.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prone Positioning in Severe Acute Respiratory Distress SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- The variability of critical care bed numbers in EuropeIntensive Care Medicine, 2012
- Effective Retention Strategies for Midcareer Critical Care NursesNursing Research, 2012
- Intensive Care Unit Bed Availability and Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Sudden Clinical DeteriorationArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2012
- Incidence of hospital admissions and severe outcomes during the first and second waves of pandemic (H1N1) 2009Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2010
- Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adultsThe Lancet, 2010
- Review of a Large Clinical Series: Structure, Process, and Outcome of all Intensive Care Units Within the Province of British Columbia, CanadaJournal of Intensive Care Medicine, 2010
- Critically Ill Patients With 2009 Influenza A(H1N1) Infection in CanadaJAMA, 2009
- Seasonal bed closures in an intensive care unit: A qualitative studyJournal of Critical Care, 2003
- Current and Projected Workforce Requirements for Care of the Critically Ill and Patients With Pulmonary DiseaseCan We Meet the Requirements of an Aging Population?JAMA, 2000