Further evidence in support of psychological flexibility as a model of eudaimonic activity
- 28 June 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
- Vol. 33
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- A question of continuity: a self‐determination theory perspective on “third‐wave” behavioral theories and practicesWorld Psychiatry, 2021
- Report of the ACBS Task Force on the strategies and tactics of contextual behavioral science researchJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2021
- Defining and measuring “psychological flexibility”: A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectivesClinical Psychology Review, 2021
- Acceptance and commitment therapy and subjective wellbeing: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials in adultsJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2020
- Process-based functional analysis can help behavioral science step up to novel challenges: COVID - 19 as an exampleJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2020
- Constructing a liberated and modern mind: six pathways from pathology to euthymiaWorld Psychiatry, 2020
- Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four culturesMotivation and Emotion, 2014
- Contextual Behavioral Science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human conditionJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 2012
- New Measures of Well-Being2009
- Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimoniaJournal of Happiness Studies, 2006