Effect of Cervical and Thoracic Manipulation on Pulmonary Function, Heart Rate Variability, and Blood Pressure in Individuals with Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: An Exploratory and Hypothesis-Generating Study
Authors:
- Fabiana Pinto SardinhaFSFabiana Pinto Sardinha
- Linda S. PescatelloLPLinda S. Pescatello
- Paulo H. MarchettiPMPaulo H. Marchetti
- Alexandre Gonçalves de MeirellesAMAlexandre Gonçalves de Meirelles
- Julio Cesar de Oliveira Muniz CunhaJCJulio Cesar de Oliveira Muniz Cunha
- Bruno Perez FelixBFBruno Perez Felix
- Lavínia Martins AguileraLALavínia Martins Aguilera
- Luís Felipe da Fonseca ReisLRLuís Felipe da Fonseca Reis
- Julio Guilherme SilvaJSJulio Guilherme Silva
- Bruno Curty BergaminiBBBruno Curty Bergamini
- Agnaldo José LopesAgnaldo José Lopes
- Igor Ramathur Telles de JesusIJIgor Ramathur Telles de Jesus
Preprint
- 23 October 2026
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
Background: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) is associated with persistent pulmonary, autonomic, and hemodynamic impairments. However, the acute effects of spinal manipulation on these systems in adults with PCS remain unclear. Purpose: To investigate the acute effects of combined cervical and thoracic spinal manipulation on pulmonary function, heart rate variability, and blood pressure in adults with PCS. Methods: This exploratory, hypothesis-generating study included 10 adults with PCS randomized to three sequences of spinal manipulation, sham manipulation, and control using a Latin-square crossover design with one-week washouts. Spirometry (FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC) was assessed immediately after each intervention. Blood pressure and heart rate variability indices (RMSSD, SDNN, pNN50, LF, HF, and LF/HF ratio) were recorded at rest and 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes post-intervention. Friedman/Wilcoxon tests and baseline-corrected sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: No significant differences were observed among conditions for FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC (all p>0.70), or the area under the curve of blood pressure, RMSSD, pNN50, HF, and LF/HF ratio (all p>0.27). Differences in SDNN and LF did not survive Bonferroni-corrected comparisons and disappeared after baseline correction, indicating between-session baseline variability rather than intervention effects. Conclusion: A single session of combined cervical and thoracic spinal manipulation did not produce consistent acute improvements in pulmonary function, blood pressure, or heart rate variability in adults with PCS. These physiological variables should not be considered primary indicators of response to an isolated manipulation session.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of COVID-19 on heart rate variability in post-COVID individuals compared to a control groupScientific Reports, 2024
- Long-COVID autonomic syndrome in working age and work ability impairmentScientific Reports, 2024
- Musculoskeletal crosstalk in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comorbidities: Emerging roles and therapeutic potentialsPharmacology & Therapeutics, 2024
- Autonomic dysregulation in long-term patients suffering from Post-COVID-19 Syndrome assessed by heart rate variabilityScientific Reports, 2023
- Respiratory muscle dysfunction in long-COVID patientsInfection, 2022
- Coronavirus biology and replication: implications for SARS-CoV-2Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2020
- Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and TreatmentPain and Therapy, 2019
- Immediate Effects of Thoracic Spinal Manipulation on Pulmonary Function in Stroke Patients: A Preliminary StudyJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2018
- Diagnostic accuracy of premanipulative vertebrobasilar insufficiency tests: A systematic reviewManual Therapy, 2013
- Spinal Manipulative Therapy for Elderly Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Case SeriesJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2011