Pitfalls of Using Administrative Data for Research
- 29 April 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Vol. 55 (6) , 1506-1508
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ascertainment of Colonoscopy Indication Using Administrative DataDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 2010
- Utilization of Surveillance Colonoscopy in Community PracticeGastroenterology, 2010
- Prevalence of Adenomas and Colorectal Cancer in Average Risk Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2009
- Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortiumGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2009
- Association of Colonoscopy and Death From Colorectal CancerAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2009
- Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer RoundtableGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2007
- The Use of Screening Colonoscopy for Patients Cared for by the Department of Veterans AffairsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2006
- How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC’s survey of endoscopic capacityGastroenterology, 2004
- Measuring the Quality of Diabetes Care Using Administrative Data: Is There Bias?Health Services Research, 2003
- Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal CancerAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002