Prevalence and risk factors for third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi‐country study
- 12 January 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Vol. 119 (3) , 340-347
Abstract
Please cite this paper as: Hirayama F, Koyanagi A, Mori R, Zhang J, Souza J, Gülmezoglu A. Prevalence and risk factors for third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: a multi‐country study. BJOG 2012;119:340–347.Objective To investigate the prevalence and risk factors of third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations in 24, mainly developing, countries.Design Analysis using cross‐sectional data from the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health.Setting Seven African, nine Asian and eight Latin American countries.Population Women at admission to hospital for delivery in 373 facilities between 2004 and 2008.Methods We estimated the country‐wise prevalence of third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations, and conducted region‐wise multivariate logistic regression analyses to identify its risk factors.Main outcome measures Prevalence and risk factors of third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations.Results A total of 214 599 women who underwent vaginal delivery were analysed. The prevalence of third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations ranged widely across countries [from 0.1% (China, Cambodia, India) to 15.0% (Philippines)] and facilities (from null to 76.3%). After the deletion of facilities reporting no third‐ or fourth‐degree perineal lacerations, and also highly outlying facilities, the range in prevalence was 0.1% (Uganda) to 1.4% (Japan). Forceps‐assisted delivery, nulliparity and high birthweight were significant risk factors in all three regions. Vacuum‐assisted delivery was also a significant risk factor in Africa and Asia.Conclusions Misdiagnosis of third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations in developing countries may be common. Correct recognition and diagnosis may lead to timely treatment and fewer sequelae. Risk factors of third‐ and fourth‐degree perineal lacerations in developing countries were similar to those previously reported from developed countries.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tearJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2009
- Perineal Trauma and Postpartum Perineal Morbidity in Asian and Non-Asian Primiparous Women Giving Birth in AustraliaJournal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 2008
- Trends in major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma, 1996-2006International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2008
- Psychological morbidity and female urinary incontinenceBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2007
- Risk factors for the breakdown of perineal laceration repair after vaginal deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2006
- Incidence and risk factors for severe perineal laceration after vaginal delivery in Japanese patientsArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2006
- Is severe perineal damage increased in women with prior anal sphincter injury?The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2006
- Risk factors for perineal injury during deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Racial differences in severe perineal lacerations after vaginal deliveryAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2003
- Epidural Analgesia and Severe Perineal Laceration in a Community-based Obstetric PracticeThe Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2003