Multi‐Centre External Validation of a Nomogram for 10‐Year Periodontal Tooth Loss Prediction
Authors:
- Matteo SerroniMSMatteo Serroni
- Andrea RavidàARAndrea Ravidà
- Pasquale SantamariaPSPasquale Santamaria
- Debora R. DiasDDDebora R. Dias
- Guo‐Liang ChengGuo‐Liang Cheng
- Samar ShaikhSSSamar Shaikh
- Nima David NatanziNNNima David Natanzi
- Muhammad H. A. SalehMuhammad H. A. Saleh
- Luigi NibaliLNLuigi Nibali
- Giuseppe TroianoGiuseppe Troiano
Open Access
- 10 March 2025
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Periodontology
- Vol. 52 (7) , 1044-1055
Abstract
Aims: To externally validate the potential applicability of the 2018 classification of periodontal diseases as a risk assessment tool, through the use of a nomogram built on a multivariate predictor model.Materials and Methods: Data from 459 patients with periodontitis, across four cohorts (three in the United States, and one in the United Kingdom), were retrospectively analysed. After staging and grading periodontitis before active periodontal therapy (APT), patients were categorised by the model as having ‘low tooth loss’ (≤ 1 teeth lost due periodontal reasons [TLP]) or ‘high tooth loss’ (≥ 2 TLP) at a 10‐year follow‐up. Model discrimination was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC‐ROC) curve. Calibration was assessed through calibration plots, calibration‐in‐the‐large (CITL), calibration slope and the expected:observed (E:O) ratio. Recalibration methods, including Temperature Scaling, Isotonic Regression and Beta Calibration, were also tested.Results: The original nomogram yielded an aggregate AUC‐ROC 0.72 but showed poor calibration. Isotonic recalibration improved the AUC‐ROC to 0.77 and enhanced calibration metrics, achieving an E‐statistic of 1.00, CITL of 0.00 and a calibration slope of 1.00.Conclusion: A nomogram based on the components of the 2018 periodontal disease classification can serve as a prognostic tool with cross‐site applicability across clinical settings in industrialised countries, accurately predicting the 10‐year risk of tooth loss due to periodontitis from the initial assessment conducted before the start of APT.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Minimum sample size calculations for external validation of a clinical prediction model with a time‐to‐event outcomeStatistics in Medicine, 2021
- The importance of being external. methodological insights for the external validation of machine learning models in medicineComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 2021
- Long-term periodontitis treatment costs according to the 2018 classification of periodontal diseasesJournal of Dentistry, 2020
- Radiomics and Machine Learning in Oral HealthcareProteomics – Clinical Applications, 2020
- Periodontitis: Consensus report of workgroup 2 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and ConditionsJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2018
- Prediction models need appropriate internal, internal–external, and external validationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2016
- Primary and secondary prevention of periodontal and peri‐implant diseasesJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2015
- Effect of professional mechanical plaque removal performed on a long‐term, routine basis in the secondary prevention of periodontitis: a systematic reviewJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2015
- Risk factor assessment tools for the prevention of periodontitis progression a systematic reviewJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2015
- Effect of professional mechanical plaque removal on secondary prevention of periodontitis and the complications of gingival and periodontal preventive measuresJournal of Clinical Periodontology, 2015