Comparison of treatment effects between clear aligners and fixed appliances in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization
Authors:
- 11 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Orthodontics
- Vol. 46 (3)
Abstract
The biomechanics in achieving molar distalization may differ between fixed appliances and clear aligners in the control of tooth movement. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment effects between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances (FA) in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization. The sample consisted of 46 subjects with mild-to-moderate crowding. A total of 22 patients treated with clear aligners (age, 25.66 ± 6.11 years old) and 24 patients treated with fixed appliances (age, 24.04 ± 4.95 years old) for miniscrew-assisted molar distalization were included in this study. The dental and skeletal changes were evaluated by the pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms. Significant changes were found with the vertical variables SN-OP angle (2.24 ± 3.22°, P < .05) and SN-MP angle (0.73 ± 1.15°, P < .05) for the FA group when compared with the CA group (SN-OP angle 0.41 ± 2.26° and SN-MP angle −0.21 ± 1.38°, P > .05). Both treatment groups achieved a 2–3 mm. molar distalization with significant intrusion of the upper molars. The CA group showed significantly less distal tipping of molars (U6^PP angle −2.29 ± 3.29° and L6^MP angle −2.92 ± 2.49°, P < .05) compared to the FA group (−5.24 ± 4.28° and −5.53 ± 5.03°, P < .05). In addition, significant retraction and lingual inclination of the upper and lower incisors were found in both groups. The changes of tooth position were evaluated by 2D lateral cephalograms, not 3D measurements. Compared to fixed appliances, clear aligners seemed to have better control of vertical dimension and distal tipping of molars in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of maxillary anterior tooth movement between Invisalign and fixed appliancesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2023
- Comparison of treatment effects after total mandibular arch distalization with miniscrews vs ramal plates in patients with Class III malocclusionAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2022
- A comparative assessment of the dentoskeletal effects of clear aligners vs miniplate-supported posterior intrusion with fixed appliances in adult patients with anterior open bite. A multicenter, retrospective cohort studyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2022
- Esthetic perception of changes in facial profile resulting from orthodontic treatment with extraction of premolarsThe Journal of the American Dental Association, 2017
- Forces and moments generated by removable thermoplastic aligners: Incisor torque, premolar derotation, and molar distalizationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2014
- Control of lower incisor inclination with a completely customized lingual appliance for dentoalveolar compensation of class III malocclusionJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2013
- Nonsurgical correction of a Class III malocclusion in an adult by miniscrew-assisted mandibular dentition distalizationAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2013
- Treatment effects of microimplant-aided sliding mechanics on distal retraction of posterior teethAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011
- Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescentsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010
- The reliability of head film measurementsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1971