Cervical Electromyogram Profile Differences Between Patients of Neck Pain and Control
Authors:
- Shrawan KumarShrawan Kumar
- Yogesh NarayanYNYogesh Narayan
- Narasimha PrasadNPNarasimha Prasad
- Ashfaq ShuaibASAshfaq Shuaib
- Zaeem A. SiddiqiZSZaeem A. Siddiqi
- 1 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Spine
- Vol. 32 (8) , E246-E253
Abstract
A comparative analysis of electromyogram (EMG) signals of patients of cervical pain and normal controls. To determine the differences between frequency and time domain parameters of EMG signals of patients of cervical pain and normal controls. No diagnostic technique has emerged as a satisfactory tool for identification of spinal pain. Seventeen male and 17 female chronic neck pain patients without cervical radiculopathy were recruited through neurology EMG clinic. The controls consisted of 30 male and 33 female subjects with no history of neck pain in the past 12 months. All subjects performed flexion, left anterolateral flexion, left lateral flexion, left posterolateral extension, and extension to pain threshold/20% maximum voluntary contraction and pain tolerance/maximum voluntary contraction in random order. The descriptive statistics for body weight normalized strength, normalized peak EMG, time to onset, time to peak, median frequency, mean power frequency, and frequency bands were calculated. These variables were subjected to analysis of variance and logistic regression to distinguish between patients and controls. The normalized peak EMG of patients was significantly greater than those of controls in both maximal and submaximal exertions (P < 0.01). Whereas there was no consistent pattern in time to peak EMG, the time to onset of EMG revealed that the left sternocleidomastoid was always recruited before the onset of torque. A lack of significant difference in the median frequency of the 2 samples indicates that the pain did not disturb the muscle conduction velocity. Using discriminant logistic regression on frequency domain and time domain parameters, up to 97% of patients and controls were correctly classified with the resubstitution method. Surface EMG can be used successfully in distinguishing chronic pain patients and controls, and efficacy of treatment regimes.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The association between nocturnal trapezius muscle activity and shoulder and neck painEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2004
- Parafunctional Clenching, Pain, and Effort in Temporomandibular DisordersJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2004
- An Electromyographic Study of Low-Velocity Rear-End ImpactsSpine, 2002
- Cervical strength of young adults in sagittal, coronal, and intermediate planesClinical Biomechanics, 2001
- Theories of musculoskeletal injury causationErgonomics, 2001
- Role of awareness in head-neck acceleration in low velocity rear-end impactsAccident Analysis & Prevention, 2000
- Maximal Isometric Strength of the Cervical Musculature in 100 Healthy VolunteersSpine, 1999
- Factors influencing the resubstitution accuracy in multivariate classification analysis: implications for study design in ergonomicsErgonomics, 1997
- Mechanical stability of the in vivo lumbar spine: implications for injury and chronic low back painClinical Biomechanics, 1996
- The Stabilizing System of the Spine. Part I. Function, Dysfunction, Adaptation, and EnhancementJournal of Spinal Disorders, 1992