Characterizing pediatric trauma patients and EMS agencies that are optimal targets for prehospital pediatric blood transfusion programs
- 2 July 2026
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Prehospital Emergency Care
- p. 1-15
Abstract
Trauma is a leading cause of death among children the United States. Prehospital blood product administration is a potentially lifesaving measure for injured children. We evaluated how often injured children meet physiological criteria for transfusion, determined the use of prehospital blood products in this sample, and identified agency characteristics that can inform the implementation of additional prehospital transfusion programs. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the 2021-2024 National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) datasets. We included children (th centile for age and elevated heart rate above the 85th centile or (b) a systolic blood pressure below the 1st centile. We characterized encounters potentially eligible for prehospital blood transfusion, the use of blood products in this group, and the EMS agencies that cared for these patients. Of 2,492,731 encounters, 34,221 (1.37%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36%, 1.39%) were potentially eligible for blood transfusion. Patients meeting these criteria were more frequently adolescents (71.1%) and were involved in falls (23.4%) or motor vehicle collisions (22.6%). Blood products were administered in 669 (0.027%; 95% CI 0.025%, 0.029%) encounters overall and to 1.01% (95% CI 0.91%, 1.13%) of encounters meeting criteria for blood transfusion eligibility. In agency-level analysis, 240/16,848 (1.4%) agencies provided blood products to children, and 84.4% of eligible patients were cared for by agencies whose most common level of service was advanced life support (ALS). In multivariable analysis, agencies caring for pediatric trauma patients meeting physiologic criteria for transfusion were more likely to have higher levels of service (ALS or critical care); rural; mixed volunteer/non-volunteer; and governmental non-fire, hospital, or private, non-hospital (vs fire departments). In a nationally representative prehospital sample, many injured children appeared eligible for transfusion. Prehospital blood product use was uncommon and varied by system factors. Expanding access will require implementation of blood programs among EMS agencies most likely to treat these patients, and consideration for equipment and protocols that allow for administration of blood to children.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Establishing thresholds for shock index in children to identify major traumaInjury, 2024
- Centiles for the shock index among injured children in the prehospital settingThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2024
- Implementation of a prehospital whole blood program: Lessons learnedJACEP Open, 2024
- Comparison of Vital Sign Cutoffs to Identify Children With Major TraumaJAMA Network Open, 2024
- Association of Prehospital Transfusion With Mortality in Pediatric TraumaJAMA Pediatrics, 2023
- Empirically Derived Age-Based Vital Signs for Children in the Out-of-Hospital SettingAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2022
- Prehospital Blood Transfusions in Pediatric Patients by a Helicopter Emergency Medical ServiceAir Medical Journal, 2018
- Prehospital blood transfusions in pediatric trauma and nontrauma patients: a single-center review of safety and outcomesPediatric Surgery International, 2017
- Prehospital Use of Blood and Plasma in Pediatric Trauma PatientsAir Medical Journal, 2015
- The impact of blood product ratios in massively transfused pediatric trauma patientsThe American Journal of Surgery, 2013