Flexural strength, flexural modulus and microhardness of milled vs. fused deposition modeling printed Zirconia; effect of conventional vs. speed sintering
Authors:
Open Access
- 7 January 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Oral Health
- Vol. 24 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Background: Various methods can be used for creating zirconia dental restorations, including 3-dimensional (3D) printing and computer-aided design/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) milling. The fused deposition modeling (FDM) printing method for zirconia presents numerous advantages, albeit research on the mechanical properties of these materials and resultant restorations remains scarce. Such developments are undeniably intriguing and warrant further investigation. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the impact of the sintering firing cycle (Conventional vs. Speed sintering) on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and Vickers Microhardness of milled vs. FDM printed zirconia. Methods: A total of 60 bars (2 × 5 × 27 mm) were fabricated for flexural strength testing, along with 40 discs (12 × 1.5 mm) for Vickers microhardness testing. Half of the specimens underwent conventional sintering, while the other half underwent a speed sintering cycle. The flexural strength and modulus were determined by a three-point bending test in a universal testing machine. The microhardness of the specimens was evaluated using a Vickers microhardness tester. Statistical analysis was performed using a two-way ANOVA test with a post-hoc Tukey test (p < 0.05). Results: CAD/CAM milled zirconia had significantly higher flexural strength and modulus than FDM-printed zirconia. The sintering process did not significantly affect the flexural strength or modulus of milled or FDM-printed zirconia. The milled speed sintering group had significantly higher values in the Vickers microhardness test compared to the other groups. Conclusions: The mechanical properties of FDM-printed zirconia specimens were not found to be comparable to those of milled zirconia. Speed sintering cycle may produce milled zirconia restorations with similar flexural strength and modulus to conventional sintering, and even higher Vickers Microhardness values.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia (G: 254-165-1443)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- 3D printing in dentistryBritish Dental Journal, 2015
- The effects of sintering temperature and duration on the flexural strength and grain size of zirconiaActa Biomaterialia Odontologica Scandinavica, 2015
- 3D printing, polymethyl methacrylate acrylic, and fully milled zirconia for anterior implant restorations: the brave new world of prosthetic dentistry.2015
- A retrospective evaluation of zirconia-fixed partial dentures in general practices: An up to 13-year studyDental Materials, 2015
- The effect of staining and vacuum sintering on optical and mechanical properties of partially and fully stabilized monolithic zirconiaDental Materials Journal, 2015
- Trends in Computer-Aided Manufacturing in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Available StreamsInternational Journal of Dentistry, 2014
- Thermal cycling for restorative materials: Does a standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A literature reviewJournal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2014
- Densification and Geometrical Assessments of Alumina Parts Produced Through Indirect Selective Laser Sintering of Alumina-Polystyrene Composite PowderStrojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013
- The effect of zirconia sintering temperature on flexural strength, grain size, and contrast ratioClinical Oral Investigations, 2012
- Effect of sintering time on biaxial strength of zirconium dioxideDental Materials, 2009