The influence of methodological variables on the push‐out resistance to dislodgement of root filling materials: a meta‐regression analysis
- 22 September 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in International Endodontic Journal
- Vol. 49 (9) , 836-849
Abstract
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of several methodological variables on the push‐out resistance to dislodgment of root filling materials by a meta‐regression analysis of the literature. A systematic review was performed by searching the PubMed database using the terms ‘push‐out’ and ‘pushout’. Laboratory studies published before March 2015 were included. Two reviewers extracted data regarding country of origin, year of publication, tooth type, smear layer removal, root canal sealer, core material, obturation technique, sample storage, tooth portion, test machine load velocity and slice thickness. Pooled mean resistance to dislodgement of all groups from the included studies was used in a linear meta‐regression of random effects (α = 0.05). Of the 850 identified studies, 53 met the inclusion criteria. A meta‐regression of the 341 groups extracted from these articles was performed to analyse the influence of each variable on resistance to dislodgement (in MPa). The sealer, core material, obturation technique, slice thickness, storage time, load velocity and tooth portion significantly influence the results (P < 0.05). Irrigant solution and smear layer removal did not influence the resistance to dislodgement of the root filling materials (P > 0.05). Methodological variables such as sealer, core material, root filling technique, tooth type, tooth portion, slice thickness, storage time and load velocity influenced the resistance to dislodgment. The inclusion and standardization of all related variables could lead to a more comparable and reproducible analysis of the resistance to dislodgment of the root canal sealers.Keywords
This publication has 78 references indexed in Scilit:
- An in vitro comparison of bond strengths of Gutta-percha/AH Plus, Resilon/Epiphany self-etch and EndoREZ obturation system to intraradicular dentin using a push-out test designJournal of Conservative Dentistry, 2013
- Enhancing the bond of a resin‐based sealer to root dentineInternational Endodontic Journal, 2012
- Effect of plunger diameter on the push-out bond values of different root filling materialsInternational Endodontic Journal, 2011
- Comparison of the push-out shear bond strength of four types of glass ionomers when used to bond amalgam: An in vitro studyJournal of Conservative Dentistry, 2011
- Comparison of resin push-out strength to root dentin of bovine- and human-teethIndian Journal of Dental Research, 2009
- Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: A reviewJournal of Dentistry, 2007
- Modulated photoactivation methods: Influence on contraction stress, degree of conversion and push-out bond strength of composite restorativesJournal of Dentistry, 2007
- Push‐out bond strengths: the Epiphany–Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta‐perchaInternational Endodontic Journal, 2006
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?Statistics in Medicine, 2002
- Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysisBMJ, 2001