A cross-sectional analysis of harms reporting in systematic reviews evaluating laminectomy
Open Access
- 5 January 2023
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)
- Vol. 13, 100198
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Center for Health Sciences, Oklahoma State University
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effect of Local Versus Intravenous Corticosteroids on the Likelihood of Dysphagia and Dysphonia Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and FusionJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 2018
- An Evaluation of Reporting Guidelines and Clinical Trial Registry Requirements Among Plastic Surgery JournalsAnnals of Plastic Surgery, 2018
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or bothBMJ, 2017
- Can Surgeons Adequately Capture Adverse Events Using the Spinal Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and OrthoSAVES?Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2016
- PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviewsBMJ, 2016
- Side effects are incompletely reported among systematic reviews in gastroenterologyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2015
- Clinical and surgical outcomes after lumbar laminectomy: An analysis of 500 patientsSurgical Neurology International, 2015
- Use of the Spine Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury. A comparison with institutional ICD-10 coding for the identification of acute care adverse eventsSpinal Cord, 2013
- Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic reviewBMJ, 2013
- Failure or success of electronic search strategies to identify adverse effects dataJournal of the Medical Library Association, 2012