How to close the science-practice gap in nature conservation? Information sources used by practitioners
Authors:
- Yvonne FabianYFYvonne Fabian
- Kurt BollmannKBKurt Bollmann
- Peter BrangPBPeter Brang
- Caroline HeiriCHCaroline Heiri
- Roland OlschewskiRORoland Olschewski
- Andreas RiglingARAndreas Rigling
- Silvia StoferSSSilvia Stofer
- Rolf HoldereggerRHRolf Holderegger
- 1 July 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Biological Conservation
- Vol. 235, 93-101
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- WSL
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contribution of Systematic Reviews to Management DecisionsConservation Biology, 2013
- How can we improve information delivery to support conservation and restoration decisions?Biodiversity and Conservation, 2009
- Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisionsFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2009
- What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behaviorJournal of Documentation, 2008
- Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental ManagementConservation Biology, 2006
- Assessing Conservation Management's Evidence Base: a Survey of Management‐Plan Compilers in the United Kingdom and AustraliaConservation Biology, 2005
- Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making?Biological Conservation, 2004
- The need for evidence-based conservationTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2004
- Effectiveness in Conservation Practice: Pointers from Medicine and Public HealthConservation Biology, 2001
- The Gaps between Theory and Practice in Selecting Nature ReservesConservation Biology, 1999